Home›Beliefs & Restrictions›Subject›Knowledge and reasonBrowse ByKnowledge and reasonThis page groups beliefs by what they are actually about. Wikipedia notes that "to believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition 'snow is white.'" Browsing by subject lets a visitor find every belief built around the same underlying topic.FactsLearn MoreKnowledge and reasonSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsOverviewWhat Defines This GroupingWell-attestedSingle tenets, rules and prohibitions isolated from the traditions that hold them and stated in that tradition's own terms with the reason it offers. Organising religion around propositional belief is itself a Western and largely post-Reformation habit: several traditions treat practice, lineage or law as primary and have no close equivalent of the noun. 1StatusStanding as a Comparative CategoryWell-attestedUsed, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed 1Learn MoreWhat a Tradition Holds and Requires This category holds the specific things traditions believe and require: articles of faith, dietary rules, prohibitions, obligations and taboos. Where a religion entry describes a whole tradition, a belief entry isolates a single tenet or rule (the oneness of God, the prohibition of certain foods, an obligation of charity, a taboo on certain acts), and states it plainly. Each entry names the tradition that holds the belief, states it in that tradition's own terms, and gives the reason the tradition itself offers, so that comparable beliefs across traditions can be set side by side.Belief and boundary Beliefs and the rules that follow from them often mark the boundary of a community, what its members affirm and how they must live, and small differences in them can distinguish one tradition or denomination from another. The atlas treats each as the tradition presents it, without ranking or refuting. The beliefs group by kind (core tenets, cosmological beliefs, moral precepts, dietary restrictions, prohibitions and taboos), so a browser can compare, for instance, the dietary rules of several traditions together. The enacted side of religious life, rites, practices and festivals, is treated under its own categories.Knowledge and reasonFilter Results22 entriesStatus Within the TraditionAllBinding, without a formal definition (15)Genuinely disputed within the tradition (3)Rejected, or not held, within this tradition (4)Standard teaching, not formally defined (4)Origin Period Start YearAll1624 (1)1869 (1)Affirmation OfAllAnekantavada (1)The Two Truths (1)Category of BeliefAllCore Tenets (6)Cosmological Beliefs (1)Moral Precepts (2)TraditionAllAmerican Humanist Association (2)Chabad-Lubavitch (1)Digambara (1)Ethical Culture (1)Gelug (5)Humanists International (2)Ismailism (1)Jonang (2)Kagyu (1)Karma Kagyu (1)Madhyamaka (3)Mahayana (1)New Atheism (1)Nichiren (1)Nyingma (1)Quranism (1)Rinzai (1)Sakya (1)Shia (Twelver) (2)Shingon (1)Soto (1)Sunni (1)Svetambara (1)Tendai (2)Tiantai (2)Tibetan Buddhism (1)Vajrayana (1)Zaidiyyah (1)Zen (1)ObligationAllObligatory (13)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 22All phenomena lack intrinsic nature (svabhava)Knowledge and reasonAl-Masalih al-Mursala: Unstated Public Benefit Is a Ground for RulingKnowledge and reasonAnalogical Reasoning Is Not a Source of LawKnowledge and reasonAnekantavada (many-sidedness of truth)Knowledge and reasonAql: Reason Stands Beside Quran, Sunna and Consensus as a Source of LawKnowledge and reasonBelief should be proportioned to the evidenceKnowledge and reasonContemplative Prayer Worked Through the Faculties of Chochmah, Binah and DaatKnowledge and reasonFormal debate as a means of realizationKnowledge and reasonFree inquiry must not be limited by dogma or authorityKnowledge and reasonGood and Evil Are Knowable by ReasonKnowledge and reasonGood and Evil Are Known Only Through RevelationKnowledge and reasonIstihsan: A Jurist May Set Aside a Strict Analogy for a Better RulingKnowledge and reasonJuristic Preference Is Not a Valid Source of LawKnowledge and reasonMiracles and revealed prophecy are not credibleKnowledge and reasonOther-emptiness (shentong): ultimate reality is empty of what is other than itselfKnowledge and reasonQiyas: Analogical Reasoning Is a Source of LawKnowledge and reasonReligious truth is known by reason, not revelationKnowledge and reasonSelf-emptiness (rangtong): things are empty of their own inherent existenceKnowledge and reasonThe middle way avoids both eternalism and annihilationismKnowledge and reasonThe threefold truth: emptiness, provisional existence and the middleKnowledge and reasonThe two truths, conventional and ultimateKnowledge and reasonWhether any god exists is unknown and may be unknowableKnowledge and reasonSources1. Belief, Language, and Experiencetier 1Rodney Needham, Basil Blackwell, 1972Divinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptionstier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.