Home›Cosmological Age›Belongs To TraditionBrowse ByBelongs To TraditionThis page groups cosmological ages by the tradition whose own cycle of time they belong to. Wikipedia notes that "in the Mahabharata, the words yuga and kalpa (a day of Brahma) are used interchangeably to describe the cycle of creation and destruction," showing how tightly one tradition's vocabulary shapes its ages. Browsing by belongs-to-tradition lets a visitor find every age drawn from the same tradition's reckoning of time.FactsLearn MoreBelongs To TraditionSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsDirectoryCategoryWell-attestedAges 1Learn MoreA Cycle Rather Than a Stage This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.Cosmological Age gathers the entries in this atlas that describe an entire scheme of cosmic time rather than one stage inside a scheme. The four zodiacal ages, Aquarius, Aries, Pisces and Taurus, are the best known members: each is a roughly two thousand year span defined by the constellation the spring equinox point is passing through, itself a consequence of a single larger cycle, the Great Year, in which the wobble of Earth's axis carries that point backward through the zodiac over about 25,772 years. The Great Year is therefore both a member of this group in its own right and the astronomical clock the four zodiacal ages are read off, the group's clearest case of one member explaining the others. The Stoic Cosmic Cycle and the Empedoclean Cosmic Cycle belong here for a different reason: neither divides time into a sequence of named stages the way Hesiod's five ages or the Hindu yugas do. Both describe the whole cosmos repeatedly dissolving and reforming, in Stoic doctrine by a universal conflagration governed by the divine fire the Stoics called Logos, in Empedocles by the alternating dominance of Love and Strife over four eternal roots. What unites every member here is scale and kind: a cosmological age names how time itself is structured or repeats, not a numbered turn within an already fixed sequence, which is what the position groups elsewhere in this taxonomy record instead.Belongs To TraditionFilter Results6 entriesAdherents Today MaximumAll121,962 (1)14,800,000 (1)324,000,000 (1)Adherents Today MinimumAll111,691 (1)14,800,000 (1)324,000,000 (1)Basis of the Membership FigureAllIndependent Survey (3)Scholarly or Demographic Estimate (2)Era of Decline End YearAll529 (1)550 (1)Era of Decline Start YearAll380 (2)651 (1)Establishment StatusAllDeclared Not Established (1)Disestablished (1)Varies by Province (1)How the Expectation Is EnforcedAllCustomary Norm (2)Membership Figure As OfAll2004-01-01 (1)2010-01-01 (1)2012-01-01 (1)2012-12-18 (1)2013-01-01 (1)2020-01-01 (2)2024-01-01 (1)Origin Period End YearAll3000 BCE (1)700 BCE (1)600 BCE (1)400 BCE (2)1980 (1)Origin Period Start YearAll3300 BCE (1)1500 BCE (1)1400 BCE (1)586 BCE (1)500 BCE (1)1970 (1)Position on SexualityAllThe body holds no single settled position; the question is actively and openly contested within it (1)Position on UsuryAllInterest is permitted but bound by ethical constraints against exploiting the poor (1)Practice StatusAllDiscontinued as a state religion (2)Living, and practised in varied local forms (1)Partly restricted: some elements are closed to outsiders (2)Standard Rate ExpectedAllTen percent. (1)Status TodayAllHistorical; not practised continuously (2)Living tradition, practised today (4)TheologyAllDualist: two opposed cosmic principles (1)Monistic: one ultimate reality behind all appearance (1)Monotheistic: one God (2)Non-theistic: no creator god is central (1)Polytheistic: many gods (2)Show ResultsBrowseCompareAncient Egyptian ReligionBelongs To Tradition1 entryAncient Greek ReligionBelongs To Tradition1 entryBuddhismBelongs To Tradition1 entryJudaismBelongs To Tradition1 entryNew AgeBelongs To Tradition1 entryZoroastrianismBelongs To Tradition1 entrySources1. Divinity Atlas Directory Taxonomy, First Edition Category Treetier 1Divinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptionstier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.