Sabarimala, Sacred Sites
Standing
Concerns Legal Status
Currently States The 2018 judgment permitting entry to women of menstruating age stands and has not been overturned, but the question is not settled. The 2018 ruling was four judges to one, with Justice Indu Malhotra dissenting; review petitions followed, and in November 2019 a five-judge bench referred the wider constitutional questions to a larger bench while keeping the reviews themselves pending. A nine-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant took up that reference, heard sixteen days of argument between 7 and 22 April 2026 on denominational autonomy, temple entry and the scope of the essential religious practices doctrine, and reserved its verdict on 14 May 2026. No judgment had been delivered as of this reading, and no delivery date has been announced.
What is settled: the 2018 judgment is in force today and Sabarimala has not been permitted to reinstate the exclusion. What is not settled: the constitutional reasoning behind it, since the 2019 referral put the underlying questions, the scope of the essential religious practices doctrine chief among them, before a larger bench, and that bench, now constituted at nine judges, has heard full argument and reserved judgment without yet deciding. The reference is also tagged to related questions on Muslim women entering mosques, a Parsi woman's temple rights after marrying outside the faith, and Dawoodi Bohra female genital cutting, so whatever the nine-judge bench decides is expected to reach beyond this one site.
Source Supreme Court Observer, "Sabarimala Reference: Day 16, Supreme Court Reserves Judgement" (14 May 2026), Supreme Court Observer editorial staff