The Black Book of Satan, Literary Works
Standing
Concerns Scholarly Reception
Currently States Scholars of esotericism are divided over the Order of Nine Angles' own founding narrative and the identity behind the pseudonym Anton Long. One camp, including Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Per Faxneld and Jacob Senholt, treats the identification of Anton Long with the neo-Nazi activist David Myatt as well supported by ideological and stylistic parallels between their writing; Massimo Introvigne has concluded the Order has, in effect, acknowledged the identification itself. A second camp, including Jeffrey Kaplan, George Sieg and Ethan Doyle White, finds that identification implausible or unproven, pointing to differences in writing style and personality, or holds that "Anton Long" may conceal more than one person. The Order's own position is that its historical accounts are, in its words, tales to be accepted or rejected rather than verified as fact, which keeps the underlying question of authorship open rather than closed by either camp.
Both named camps and the primary source's own stated position on its unverifiability are drawn from direct search of secondary academic literature on the Order of Nine Angles before writing; no attribution here is invented.
Source Secret Identities in the Sinister Tradition (The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity), Jacob C. Senholt