Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,862 statements.

Devanagari Vocalic R ऋ, Associated SoundPronounced ri or ru across northern India today, against a classical description of a single vowel sound; transliteration practice varies for that reason

Devanagari Vocalic R ऋ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Associated Sound

Currently States Pronounced ri or ru across northern India today, against a classical description of a single vowel sound; transliteration practice varies for that reason

According To Modern Indian pronunciation against the classical description

Two camps, and both are right about different things. The classical phonetic descriptions treat the sound as a pure vowel; modern spoken usage across the Hindi belt inserts a following vowel. The disagreement is between a historical reconstruction and a living pronunciation, not about what the letter is.

Source Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language and the Older Dialects of Veda and Brahmana, William Dwight Whitney

Devaraja, Standing as a Comparative CategoryUsed, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed

Devaraja, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Standing as a Comparative Category

Currently States Used, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed

Hermann Kulke's The Devaraja Cult (Cornell University Southeast Asia Program, 1978) sets out two readings of the same Sdok Kok Thom inscription: George Coedes read devaraja as god-king, the royal essence identified with Shiva in a linga, while Kulke's own philological re-examination of the same Khmer and Sanskrit text reads it instead as king of the gods, a tutelary deity served by a hereditary priestly family, with the king as servant rather than god.

Source The Devaraja Cult, Hermann Kulke

Devaraja, Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within this tradition

Devaraja, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Status Within the Tradition

Currently States Genuinely disputed within this tradition

Hermann Kulke's The Devaraja Cult (1978) records that earlier scholarship applied devaraja as a widespread Southeast Asian god-king cult uniting Hindu and Buddhist kingship across the region; more recent scholarship, examining the individual Khmer, Cham and Javanese inscriptions rather than assuming a single institution behind them, holds the evidence for one coherent cult across all the cases grouped under the label is thinner than once assumed.

Source The Devaraja Cult, Hermann Kulke

Devaraja, Scholarly VerdictGeorge Coedes, the same scholar who framed the original devaraja theory, later argued that Theravada Buddhism's denial of the ultimate reality of the individual self sapped the vitality of the royal personality cult that had sustained Angkor's monument building, contributing to the empire's fourteenth and fifteenth century decline. Other historians read the timing differently, pointing instead to Ayutthaya's military campaigns, neglected irrigation infrastructure, and a documented period of severe drought across mainland Southeast Asia in the early fifteenth century; no single cause is settled.

Devaraja, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Scholarly Verdict

Currently States George Coedes, the same scholar who framed the original devaraja theory, later argued that Theravada Buddhism's denial of the ultimate reality of the individual self sapped the vitality of the royal personality cult that had sustained Angkor's monument building, contributing to the empire's fourteenth and fifteenth century decline. Other historians read the timing differently, pointing instead to Ayutthaya's military campaigns, neglected irrigation infrastructure, and a documented period of severe drought across mainland Southeast Asia in the early fifteenth century; no single cause is settled.

Source Angkor (Wikipedia), Wikipedia contributors

Ḍhaddha ਢ, Origin PeriodSikh tradition credits Guru Angad, the second Guru, with giving the script its settled form in the sixteenth century

Ḍhaddha ਢ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Sikh tradition credits Guru Angad, the second Guru, with giving the script its settled form in the sixteenth century

According To The Gurmukhi script

Two reference works give incompatible accounts. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (Harbans Singh, editor-in-chief, Punjabi University, Patiala, 1998) carries the Sikh tradition that Guru Angad, the second Guru (1504-1552), devised the script. The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996), surveying the paleography of Indic scripts, holds instead that the letterforms were already in mercantile use in the Punjab as one of the Landa scripts descended from Sharada, and that comparing those existing Landa forms against the Gurmukhi letters attested from Guru Angad's era shows a fixing and standardising of a repertoire already in circulation rather than an invention from nothing. Neither side has displaced the other because the two accounts read different kinds of evidence, a community's own historical memory against a comparative script lineage, and the atlas records both without adjudicating.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Harbans Singh (editor-in-chief)

Ḍhaddha ਢ, Origin PeriodHistorians of Indic writing place the letterforms earlier, in the Landa mercantile hands already used across the Punjab

Ḍhaddha ਢ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Historians of Indic writing place the letterforms earlier, in the Landa mercantile hands already used across the Punjab

According To The Gurmukhi script

Two reference works give incompatible accounts. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (Harbans Singh, editor-in-chief, Punjabi University, Patiala, 1998) carries the Sikh tradition that Guru Angad, the second Guru (1504-1552), devised the script. The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996), surveying the paleography of Indic scripts, holds instead that the letterforms were already in mercantile use in the Punjab as one of the Landa scripts descended from Sharada, and that comparing those existing Landa forms against the Gurmukhi letters attested from Guru Angad's era shows a fixing and standardising of a repertoire already in circulation rather than an invention from nothing. Neither side has displaced the other because the two accounts read different kinds of evidence, a community's own historical memory against a comparative script lineage, and the atlas records both without adjudicating.

Source The World's Writing Systems, Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Dhaddha ਧ, Origin PeriodSikh tradition credits Guru Angad, the second Guru, with giving the script its settled form in the sixteenth century

Dhaddha ਧ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Sikh tradition credits Guru Angad, the second Guru, with giving the script its settled form in the sixteenth century

According To The Gurmukhi script

Two reference works give incompatible accounts. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (Harbans Singh, editor-in-chief, Punjabi University, Patiala, 1998) carries the Sikh tradition that Guru Angad, the second Guru (1504-1552), devised the script. The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996), surveying the paleography of Indic scripts, holds instead that the letterforms were already in mercantile use in the Punjab as one of the Landa scripts descended from Sharada, and that comparing those existing Landa forms against the Gurmukhi letters attested from Guru Angad's era shows a fixing and standardising of a repertoire already in circulation rather than an invention from nothing. Neither side has displaced the other because the two accounts read different kinds of evidence, a community's own historical memory against a comparative script lineage, and the atlas records both without adjudicating.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Harbans Singh (editor-in-chief)

Dhaddha ਧ, Origin PeriodHistorians of Indic writing place the letterforms earlier, in the Landa mercantile hands already used across the Punjab

Dhaddha ਧ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Historians of Indic writing place the letterforms earlier, in the Landa mercantile hands already used across the Punjab

According To The Gurmukhi script

Two reference works give incompatible accounts. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (Harbans Singh, editor-in-chief, Punjabi University, Patiala, 1998) carries the Sikh tradition that Guru Angad, the second Guru (1504-1552), devised the script. The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996), surveying the paleography of Indic scripts, holds instead that the letterforms were already in mercantile use in the Punjab as one of the Landa scripts descended from Sharada, and that comparing those existing Landa forms against the Gurmukhi letters attested from Guru Angad's era shows a fixing and standardising of a repertoire already in circulation rather than an invention from nothing. Neither side has displaced the other because the two accounts read different kinds of evidence, a community's own historical memory against a comparative script lineage, and the atlas records both without adjudicating.

Source The World's Writing Systems, Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Dhu Nuwas, Lifespan or Floruit End Year530

Dhu Nuwas, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 530

Wikipedia's infobox gives birth_date as circa AD 450 and death_date as AD 530, with no citation on either field; the lead separately states his reign ran AD 522-530. The Divinity Atlas's own Open Questions 259442 and 259833 record that Dhu Nuwas is known only from the years of his reign, fixed by Sabaic inscriptions under his regnal name and by Syriac accounts of the Najran massacre around 523, that no source independent of his reign names a birth year, and that no source describes how or exactly when he died, the horse-into-the-sea story being a much later Arabic narrative motif rather than a contemporary account. 450 (circa) and 530 are recorded here as the commonly repeated figures, not as settled fact; his reign dates (522-530) are the one part of this that independent inscriptions do fix.

Source Wikipedia: Dhu Nuwas

Dhu Nuwas, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year450

Dhu Nuwas, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 450

Wikipedia's infobox gives birth_date as circa AD 450 and death_date as AD 530, with no citation on either field; the lead separately states his reign ran AD 522-530. The Divinity Atlas's own Open Questions 259442 and 259833 record that Dhu Nuwas is known only from the years of his reign, fixed by Sabaic inscriptions under his regnal name and by Syriac accounts of the Najran massacre around 523, that no source independent of his reign names a birth year, and that no source describes how or exactly when he died, the horse-into-the-sea story being a much later Arabic narrative motif rather than a contemporary account. 450 (circa) and 530 are recorded here as the commonly repeated figures, not as settled fact; his reign dates (522-530) are the one part of this that independent inscriptions do fix.

Source Wikipedia: Dhu Nuwas

Dhyana (Meditative Concentration), Origin PeriodDhyana as the fifth of the six Mahayana perfections, the stabilised, unified attention the earlier perfections prepare a practitioner to sustain, develops within the same early Mahayana Prajnaparamita literature as the six-paramita scheme as a whole, roughly the first centuries BCE and CE, and is treated as the immediate precondition for prajna, the sixth and culminating perfection.

Dhyana (Meditative Concentration), Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Dhyana as the fifth of the six Mahayana perfections, the stabilised, unified attention the earlier perfections prepare a practitioner to sustain, develops within the same early Mahayana Prajnaparamita literature as the six-paramita scheme as a whole, roughly the first centuries BCE and CE, and is treated as the immediate precondition for prajna, the sixth and culminating perfection.

Source Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, Paul Williams

Dies Irae, Attributed Author / CompilerTradition credits the sequence to the Franciscan friar Thomas of Celano, Francis of Assisi's biographer, but the ascription rests on late testimony rather than any claim in Celano's own surviving works. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) treats the attribution as uncertain, and manuscript evidence shows the text drawing on earlier models, so other thirteenth century Franciscan authors have also been proposed with no settlement among scholars.

Dies Irae, Hymns & Liturgical Texts

Standing

Concerns Attributed Author / Compiler

Currently States Tradition credits the sequence to the Franciscan friar Thomas of Celano, Francis of Assisi's biographer, but the ascription rests on late testimony rather than any claim in Celano's own surviving works. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) treats the attribution as uncertain, and manuscript evidence shows the text drawing on earlier models, so other thirteenth century Franciscan authors have also been proposed with no settlement among scholars.

The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) is the reference examining the traditional ascription of this thirteenth century Latin sequence to the Franciscan friar Thomas of Celano, Francis of Assisi's biographer. It finds the ascription rests on testimony recorded later than Celano's own lifetime rather than on any claim made in his own surviving works, and that manuscript evidence shows the text itself drawing on earlier liturgical models rather than appearing whole from one author. On that basis it treats the attribution as uncertain and records that other thirteenth century Franciscan authors have also been proposed, with no settlement reached among scholars.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Dikenga, Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within this tradition

Dikenga, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Status Within the Tradition

Currently States Genuinely disputed within this tradition

The Encyclopedia of Religion, second edition, Mircea Eliade founding editor, Lindsay Jones revising editor, Macmillan Reference, 2005, documents the dikenga, the Kongo cosmogram, through the twentieth century scholarship of Robert Farris Thompson and K. Kia Bunseki Fu-Kiau, and sets out two questions their documentation of its diaspora reappearance left open rather than resolved. The method at issue is comparative: reading markings drawn on the ground in Cuban Palo, ritual markings recorded in the American South, and objects some scholars argue were incised by enslaved people in North America against the documented Kongo original, to judge whether each is a genuine continuation of the cosmogram or a simple cross-in-circle form read into ambiguous marks after the fact. Because the diagram's geometry is simple enough to arise independently, and because the North American archaeological claims rest on artifacts open to more than one reading, neither question has been settled by the evidence so far assembled.

Source Encyclopedia of Religion, Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Dikenga, Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within the tradition

Dikenga, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Status Within the Tradition

Currently States Genuinely disputed within the tradition

The Encyclopedia of Religion, second edition, Mircea Eliade founding editor, Lindsay Jones revising editor, Macmillan Reference, 2005, documents the dikenga, the Kongo cosmogram, through the twentieth century scholarship of Robert Farris Thompson and K. Kia Bunseki Fu-Kiau, and sets out two questions their documentation of its diaspora reappearance left open rather than resolved. The method at issue is comparative: reading markings drawn on the ground in Cuban Palo, ritual markings recorded in the American South, and objects some scholars argue were incised by enslaved people in North America against the documented Kongo original, to judge whether each is a genuine continuation of the cosmogram or a simple cross-in-circle form read into ambiguous marks after the fact. Because the diagram's geometry is simple enough to arise independently, and because the North American archaeological claims rest on artifacts open to more than one reading, neither question has been settled by the evidence so far assembled.

Source Encyclopedia of Religion, Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Diligence, Origin PeriodDiligence's literary ancestor is the Psychomachia of Prudentius, written around 400 CE, though the poem has no combatant named diligence. Its place opposing sloth in the sevenfold contrary-virtue scheme was fixed only later, in medieval catechetical writing with no single author or date, drawing partly on Cassian's Institutes for the underlying diagnosis of acedia it answers.

Diligence, Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Diligence's literary ancestor is the Psychomachia of Prudentius, written around 400 CE, though the poem has no combatant named diligence. Its place opposing sloth in the sevenfold contrary-virtue scheme was fixed only later, in medieval catechetical writing with no single author or date, drawing partly on Cassian's Institutes for the underlying diagnosis of acedia it answers.

Source The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept, with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature, Morton W. Bloomfield

Dinah, Mythic AssociationWhether Shechem's act is best read as violent rape or as an unauthorized seduction is disputed among modern translators and scholars

Dinah, Figures

Standing

Concerns Mythic Association

Currently States Whether Shechem's act is best read as violent rape or as an unauthorized seduction is disputed among modern translators and scholars

According To Judaism

Tikva Frymer-Kensky's Reading the Women of the Bible: A New Interpretation of Their Stories (Schocken, 2002) examines the Genesis 34 narrative of Dinah and Shechem against the two competing readings of it as either a seduction or an assault. Frymer-Kensky's method is close philological analysis of the Hebrew vocabulary used and of her brothers' violent reaction to it, and she argues against the seduction reading, holding that the vocabulary and the reaction described only make sense if the text describes a genuine assault rather than a consensual encounter later regretted.

Source Reading the Women of the Bible: A New Interpretation of Their Stories, Tikva Frymer-Kensky

Din-i-Ilahi, Standing as a Comparative CategoryWhether Din i Ilahi was a genuine new religion or a court discipleship order

Din-i-Ilahi, Religions

Standing

Concerns Standing as a Comparative Category

Currently States Whether Din i Ilahi was a genuine new religion or a court discipleship order

Akbar's contemporary critic Abd al Qadir Badauni called it apostasy from Islam and a deliberate new faith; most modern historians instead read it as a personal ethical order for loyal courtiers, an instrument of political cohesion rather than a missionary religion. The atlas records both readings rather than choosing between them.

Source Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar's Reign, with Special Reference to Abu'l Fazl (1556-1605), S. A. A. Rizvi

Diocletian, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year244

Diocletian, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 244

The source gives this year as about, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th edition, Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.)

Diocletian, Lifespan or Floruit End Year311

Diocletian, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 311

The source gives this year as about, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th edition, Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth and Esther Eidinow (eds.)

Dipo, Current StatusDebated over its traditional link to early marriageability; also actively celebrated today as Krobo cultural heritage and public art.

Dipo, Rituals

Standing

Concerns Current Status

Currently States Debated over its traditional link to early marriageability; also actively celebrated today as Krobo cultural heritage and public art.

Dipo is the Krobo girls' puberty and initiation rite of Ghana, conducted under community and priestly authority; the atlas describes its existence and social significance without setting out its ceremonial procedure, in keeping with the tradition's own closed status for that material. Grace Adinku's Dipo: The Krobo Ghanaian Puberty Rite and Art (2016) documents that some Christian and reformist voices criticise the rite's historical association with marriageability, since completing Dipo traditionally signalled a girl was ready for marriage, while many Krobo families and cultural advocates defend the rite as heritage and cultural continuity rather than a marriage arrangement in the modern sense, noting that widespread school attendance has considerably widened the practical gap between the age the rite is performed and the age marriage actually occurs today. Adinku's method is ethnographic and art-historical fieldwork among Krobo communities, documenting community argument rather than the rite's own internal ceremony. Because the tension is between a historical association and a changed modern context, current status remains debated between critics reading the marriage association as still live and defenders reading it as superseded.

Source Dipo: The Krobo Ghanaian Puberty Rite and Art, Grace Uchechukwu Adinku