Religious Anti-Zionism, Doctrines
Standing
Concerns Earliest Formulation
Currently States The Three Oaths passage in the Babylonian Talmud, tractate Ketubot 111a, is the text the religious case is chiefly argued from.
The Babylonian Talmud, tractate Ketubot 111a (Anonymous, multiple authors, 1935 Soncino edition), the text the religious anti-Zionist case is chiefly argued from, sets out the Three Oaths passage: that Israel swore not to ascend the wall by mass return by force, not to rebel against the nations, and that the nations swore not to oppress Israel excessively. Whether the passage is halakhically binding is disputed among rabbinic authorities examining the same aggadic text; religious Zionist writers have answered that it is aggadic rather than legal, that the conditions have lapsed, or that the third oath binding the nations was broken first, while religious anti-Zionist readers take it as a live prohibition. Both readings work from the same passage.
Source The Babylonian Talmud, Anonymous (multiple authors)