Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,315 statements marked Debated.

Irish Confederate Wars, Death Toll Maximum620000.000000

Irish Confederate Wars, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 620000.000000

Petty's own upper estimate reached six hundred and twenty thousand, as much as two fifths of Ireland's pre-war population by some readings. Lenihan's own demographic scholarship, in his article "War and Population, 1649 to 52," argues this upper figure in particular overstates war-caused mortality, and no modern historian has produced a rival reconciled total that separates combat and massacre deaths from the era's simultaneous famine and plague.

Source Confederate Catholics at War, 1641 to 1649, Padraig Lenihan

Irish Confederate Wars, Religious DimensionThe Confederation bound its members by the Oath of Association, a specifically religious oath to defend the public and free exercise of the Catholic religion alongside the king's prerogative, and Catholic clergy sat as full members of its General Assembly; the papal nuncio Rinuccini's presence and his demand for full Catholic religious establishment as a condition of peace, which split the Confederation from within, underscore how far religion structured the conflict on the Catholic side. O Siochru's constitutional study nonetheless stresses the Confederation was never a simple Catholic crusade: its moderate faction, led by Nicholas Plunkett, was consistently willing to trade religious toleration for political accommodation with the Protestant royalist Ormond, and dynastic loyalty to Charles I and Old English constitutional grievance ran alongside religious motive throughout.

Irish Confederate Wars, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Religious Dimension

Currently States The Confederation bound its members by the Oath of Association, a specifically religious oath to defend the public and free exercise of the Catholic religion alongside the king's prerogative, and Catholic clergy sat as full members of its General Assembly; the papal nuncio Rinuccini's presence and his demand for full Catholic religious establishment as a condition of peace, which split the Confederation from within, underscore how far religion structured the conflict on the Catholic side. O Siochru's constitutional study nonetheless stresses the Confederation was never a simple Catholic crusade: its moderate faction, led by Nicholas Plunkett, was consistently willing to trade religious toleration for political accommodation with the Protestant royalist Ormond, and dynastic loyalty to Charles I and Old English constitutional grievance ran alongside religious motive throughout.

Source Confederate Ireland, 1642 to 1649: A Constitutional and Political Analysis, Micheal O Siochru

Irshya (Envy), Origin PeriodIrshya, called issa in the Pali Abhidhamma where it is treated only as a secondary mental factor, becomes the fifth of the five poisons and is read within the five Buddha family scheme as the distortion of the wisdom that accomplishes all actions only in the later, more elaborate systematisation. John Powers's Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism (Snow Lion Publications, 2007) locates that five-poison, five-Buddha-family systematisation chiefly in Tibetan scholastic and tantric literature, later than the Pali material's earlier and more modest treatment of issa.

Irshya (Envy), Vices

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Irshya, called issa in the Pali Abhidhamma where it is treated only as a secondary mental factor, becomes the fifth of the five poisons and is read within the five Buddha family scheme as the distortion of the wisdom that accomplishes all actions only in the later, more elaborate systematisation. John Powers's Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism (Snow Lion Publications, 2007) locates that five-poison, five-Buddha-family systematisation chiefly in Tibetan scholastic and tantric literature, later than the Pali material's earlier and more modest treatment of issa.

Source Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism, John Powers

Isaac, HistoricityHistoricity debated

Isaac, Figures

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States Historicity debated

Lester L. Grabbe's Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It? (2007) examines the patriarchal narratives against the archaeological and textual record for the second millennium BCE and finds no extra-biblical evidence for Isaac, and that the patriarchal narratives generally cannot be securely placed in any second-millennium setting. Judaism, Christianity and Islam nonetheless hold him to be a historical patriarch, the son of promise through whom Abraham's covenant passed to Jacob.

Source Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It?, Lester L. Grabbe

Isaac, Mythic AssociationThe Genesis account of the Binding of Isaac, in which Abraham nearly sacrifices him at God's command before a ram is substituted, names him as the son involved, though Islamic tradition more commonly identifies the son as Ishmael.

Isaac, Figures

Standing

Concerns Mythic Association

Currently States The Genesis account of the Binding of Isaac, in which Abraham nearly sacrifices him at God's command before a ram is substituted, names him as the son involved, though Islamic tradition more commonly identifies the son as Ishmael.

The rabbinic and Christian tradition, following Genesis 22, names Isaac as the son bound for sacrifice at Moriah; the Quran does not name the son at all, and while a minority of early Muslim exegetes read the unnamed son as Isaac, the majority position, and the modern popular consensus among Muslims, holds it was Ishmael, reflecting a genuine, unresolved divergence in how the three Abrahamic traditions each claim their own founding covenant narrative for their own patriarch.

Source The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), Anonymous (multiple authors)

Isaiah, Manner of DeathMartyred

Isaiah, Figures

Standing

Concerns Manner of Death

Currently States Martyred

Not recorded in the biblical text itself, but later rabbinic and Christian tradition holds he was sawn in half on the order of the wicked king Manasseh, an account many scholars connect to the unexplained reference to prophets sawn in two in Hebrews 11:37.

Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd edition, Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)

Isaiah's Messianic Prophecies, Claimed FulfillmentBoth passages read as messianic prophecy fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth.

Isaiah's Messianic Prophecies, Prophecies

Standing

Concerns Claimed Fulfillment

Currently States Both passages read as messianic prophecy fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth.

Affirmed within Christian tradition since the New Testament itself. Jewish tradition reads the Immanuel sign as addressed to King Ahaz's eighth century BCE crisis and the Suffering Servant chiefly as a figure for Israel collectively; the disagreement is one of the oldest continuous arguments between the two traditions and shows no sign of resolving.

Source The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), Anonymous (multiple authors)

Isaiah's Messianic Prophecies, Documented ResponseJudaism's own documented reading of Isaiah 7:14, distinct from the Christian messianic reading already on this row. Read directly (Aish.com, Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld): the Hebrew word is almah, "a young woman without reference to her virginity," not betulah, the Torah's own specific word for virgin, which Isaiah did not use; the sign names a contemporary woman whose son would be born imminently, in Rosenfeld's own words, this "couldn't possibly be referring to Mary who would not live for hundreds of years, and who would not bear a son till long after the battle Isaiah was referring to."

Isaiah's Messianic Prophecies, Prophecies

Standing

Concerns Documented Response

Currently States Judaism's own documented reading of Isaiah 7:14, distinct from the Christian messianic reading already on this row. Read directly (Aish.com, Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld): the Hebrew word is almah, "a young woman without reference to her virginity," not betulah, the Torah's own specific word for virgin, which Isaiah did not use; the sign names a contemporary woman whose son would be born imminently, in Rosenfeld's own words, this "couldn't possibly be referring to Mary who would not live for hundreds of years, and who would not bear a son till long after the battle Isaiah was referring to."

Source Does Isaiah 7:14 Refer to a Virgin Birth? (Aish), Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld

Isaiah's Messianic Prophecies, Documented ResponseJudaism's own documented reading of Isaiah 53's Suffering Servant. Read directly (Aish.com, Marshall Roth): the Servant is identified in the Servant Songs immediately preceding chapter 53, by Isaiah's own words, "You are My servant, O Israel" (Isaiah 41:8) and "You are My servant, Israel" (Isaiah 49:3), so, in Roth's own words, "there is no reason that the 'servant' in Isaiah 53 would suddenly switch and refer to someone other than the Jewish people."

Isaiah's Messianic Prophecies, Prophecies

Standing

Concerns Documented Response

Currently States Judaism's own documented reading of Isaiah 53's Suffering Servant. Read directly (Aish.com, Marshall Roth): the Servant is identified in the Servant Songs immediately preceding chapter 53, by Isaiah's own words, "You are My servant, O Israel" (Isaiah 41:8) and "You are My servant, Israel" (Isaiah 49:3), so, in Roth's own words, "there is no reason that the 'servant' in Isaiah 53 would suddenly switch and refer to someone other than the Jewish people."

Source Isaiah 53: The Suffering Servant (Aish), Marshall Roth

Ishmael, HistoricityHistoricity debated

Ishmael, Figures

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States Historicity debated

Lester L. Grabbe's Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It? (2007) finds no extra-biblical evidence for Ishmael on the same second-millennium documentary record, and that the patriarchal narratives cannot be securely placed in any specific setting within it. Judaism, Christianity and Islam hold him to be a historical figure, the elder son of Abraham whom Islamic tradition names a forefather of the Arabs.

Source Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It?, Lester L. Grabbe

Ishvara Pranidhana (Devotion to the Divine), Origin PeriodDated by scholars anywhere from the second century BCE to as late as the fourth or fifth century CE, the same span debated for the Yoga Sutras as a whole: an early dating follows the tradition's own attribution to a single ancient sage, while a late dating, argued by scholars such as Philipp Maas, reads the surviving text as a composite assembled together with its own earliest commentary.

Ishvara Pranidhana (Devotion to the Divine), Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Dated by scholars anywhere from the second century BCE to as late as the fourth or fifth century CE, the same span debated for the Yoga Sutras as a whole: an early dating follows the tradition's own attribution to a single ancient sage, while a late dating, argued by scholars such as Philipp Maas, reads the surviving text as a composite assembled together with its own earliest commentary.

The Yoga Sutras' date is disputed among scholars, from a single ancient author around the second century BCE to a later compilation as late as the fourth or fifth century CE; the debate turns on whether the text and its earliest surviving commentary were composed together or centuries apart.

Source The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary, Edwin F. Bryant

Ishvara Pranidhana (Devotion to the Divine), Attributed Author / CompilerTraditionally attributed to Patanjali, the compiler of the Yoga Sutras; scholarship debates whether this is the same Patanjali credited with the Sanskrit grammatical treatise of that name.

Ishvara Pranidhana (Devotion to the Divine), Virtues

Standing

Concerns Attributed Author / Compiler

Currently States Traditionally attributed to Patanjali, the compiler of the Yoga Sutras; scholarship debates whether this is the same Patanjali credited with the Sanskrit grammatical treatise of that name.

Whether the Patanjali credited with the Yoga Sutras is the same figure credited with the Sanskrit grammatical treatise of that name, and whether the text as it stands is the work of one author or a later compilation, are both disputed.

Source The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary, Edwin F. Bryant

Ishvarapranidhana, Point in DisputeHow theistic the yoga of Patanjali really is, since his Ishvara, a special self untouched by affliction and karma and designated by the syllable Om, functions in surrender more as an object of contemplation than as a creator of the world. Edwin F. Bryant's The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary (North Point Press, 2009) surveys commentators who have argued the question for a long time.

Ishvarapranidhana, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States How theistic the yoga of Patanjali really is, since his Ishvara, a special self untouched by affliction and karma and designated by the syllable Om, functions in surrender more as an object of contemplation than as a creator of the world. Edwin F. Bryant's The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary (North Point Press, 2009) surveys commentators who have argued the question for a long time.

Source The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary, Edwin F. Bryant

Islam Arises in Mecca, Start Year610

Islam Arises in Mecca, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 610

Islamic tradition places Muhammad's first reported revelation around 610 CE at Mount Hira near Mecca; the precise year rests on later biographical and hadith literature rather than a contemporary record, so 610 is used as a representative year for the start of this period.

Source Ibn Ishaq (recension of Ibn Hisham), Sirat Rasul Allah, translated by A. Guillaume as The Life of Muhammad, Ibn Ishaq; ed. Ibn Hisham; trans. A. Guillaume

Islam Is Established Among the Turkic Peoples of Central Asia, Start Year892

Islam Is Established Among the Turkic Peoples of Central Asia, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 892

Turkic conversion to Islam under Samanid influence in Transoxiana was a gradual process spanning generations rather than one dated event; Satuq Bughra Khan's own personal conversion is conventionally placed around 934, decades into this window. 892 is used as a representative point at the opening of that process, not a settled year for any single conversion.

Source An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, Peter B. Golden

Islam Is Established Among the Turkic Peoples of Central Asia, End Year1005

Islam Is Established Among the Turkic Peoples of Central Asia, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1005

1005 is a representative point at the close of the Samanid to Karakhanid transition, during which Turkic conversion to Islam consolidated across Transoxiana following Satuq Bughra Khan's own conversion around 934; the process had no single closing date, and this end year marks where scholarship generally treats the conversion wave as complete rather than an event fixed on the calendar.

Source An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, Peter B. Golden

Islam Is Established in Bosnia Under Ottoman Rule, End Year1600

Islam Is Established in Bosnia Under Ottoman Rule, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1600

The Islamization of the Bosnian population unfolded gradually over roughly a century after the Ottoman conquest; 1600 is a representative point near the close of that process rather than a single dated event.

Source Osman's Dream: The Story of the Ottoman Empire 1300-1923, Caroline Finkel

Islam Is Established in the Mali Empire, Start Year1050

Islam Is Established in the Mali Empire, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 1050

Trans Saharan trade carried Islam into West Africa gradually from the eleventh century onward, with no single dated conversion event; 1050 is a representative point within that gradual process, not a settled year.

Source Corpus of Early Arabic Sources for West African History, Nehemia Levtzion and J. F. P. Hopkins (eds.)

Islam Is Established in the Mali Empire, End Year1337

Islam Is Established in the Mali Empire, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1337

1337 is the conventionally cited year of Mansa Musa's death, marking the height of Mali's Islamic court culture after his 1324 hajj; exact regnal dates in the Mali Empire are approximate in the surviving record.

Source Corpus of Early Arabic Sources for West African History, Nehemia Levtzion and J. F. P. Hopkins (eds.)

Islam Is Established on the Swahili Coast, Start Year780

Islam Is Established on the Swahili Coast, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 780

Indian Ocean trade carried Islam to the Swahili coast gradually from as early as the eighth century; no single fixed arrival year is recoverable, so 780 is used as a representative point within that window.

Source The Indian Ocean, Michael Pearson