Mishefa Res, Scriptures & Texts
Standing
Concerns Attributed Author / Compiler
Currently States The prevailing scholarly view holds the manuscript itself to be a production made for the manuscript trade, though its content faithfully reflects genuine Yazidi oral tradition (critical)
Philip G. Kreyenbroek's Yezidism: Its Background, Observances and Textual Tradition, Edwin Mellen Press, 1995, examines both the Kiteba Cilwe and the Mishefa Res against the fact that Yazidism's own authoritative religious content is primarily oral, transmitted by qewwals, religious singers and reciters, rather than fixed in written scripture. Kreyenbroek's method is comparative and ethnographic: checking each written text's own transmission history, who copied, compiled or published it, and how it relates to the community's oral practice, against the oral tradition itself, and that examination does not clearly establish either document as an authentic internal scripture rather than an external compilation. Its own text states the resulting position directly, that authenticity is genuinely disputed and that the dispute itself, not the existence of the book, is the one settled fact.
Source Yezidism: Its Background, Observances and Textual Tradition, Philip G. Kreyenbroek