On Wings of Fire (1986), Screen Works
Standing
Concerns Religious Subject Matter
Currently States Dramatizes the life of Zarathustra and the thirty five hundred year history of Zoroastrianism and the Parsi community, framed through Zubin Mehta's own journey to explore his ancestral faith. Its central and unresolved question is not the history itself but how the film chooses to portray its prophet: Zarathustra is shown arguing philosophically in the court of King Vishtaspa, presented as an enlightened mortal reasoning his way to religious truth rather than as a being of higher, semi-divine standing. Zoroastrian opinion has never settled which account is correct, and the film's choice landed on one side of a real internal disagreement rather than a neutral retelling.
Three Parsi high priests, Hormazdyar Mirza, Kaikhushroo Jamapasa and Feroz Kotwal, stated in the community journal Parsiana that the film, if produced in the form and manner reported in the press, would be construed as a deliberate and malicious act intended to outrage religious beliefs, objecting specifically to its philosopher-not-divinity portrayal of Zarathustra; contemporary press coverage in India Today confirms the controversy reached the film within weeks of its 1986 premiere. Sourced to Wikipedia's reception section, corroborated by India Today's contemporary report and by the scholarly account of the underlying disagreement in Encyclopaedia Iranica.
Source Dawar, "On Wings of Fire: Cyrus H. Bharucha's Film on Zoroastrianism Generates Heat Among Orthodoxy," India Today, 1986, Rati Dawar