Doctrine
Natural Theology
Also Known As Theologia naturalis · the argument from design
Philosophy of Religion
Natural theology reasons towards God from the world rather than from scripture. It has ancient roots in Greek philosophy, a long history in Christian, Jewish and Islamic thought, and it reached its widest audience in Britain in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries through arguments drawn from the design of living things. It has always had religious critics as well as secular ones: David Hume set out the philosophical objections in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion before William Paley wrote, and a strand of Protestant theology running to Karl Barth rejected the whole enterprise as an attempt to know God on human terms. It is distinguished from revealed theology, not opposed to it, and most of its practitioners held both.
Facts
Disputed
Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within this tradition 1 The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (2024 edition), records that David Hume and Immanuel Kant subjected the classical arguments of natural theology to sustained philosophical criticism in the eighteenth century, examining each argument's logical structure in turn. Contemporary philosophers including Alvin Plantinga and Richard Swinburne have since developed more sophisticated versions engaging those objections directly, while New Atheism, Humanists International and the American Humanist Association reject the project of natural theology outright. Contested or Appropriated Modern UseDavid Hume and Immanuel Kant subjected the classical arguments to sustained philosophical criticism in the eighteenth century; contemporary philosophers including Alvin Plantinga and Richard Swinburne have developed more sophisticated versions engaging those objections directly. 1 Origins
Held ByChristian and broader theistic philosophical tradition, the project of establishing knowledge of or reasonable belief in God through unaided human reason rather than scripture or special revelation. 1 Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryA standard analytic category in the study of religion 2 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe project of establishing knowledge of or reasonable belief in God through unaided human reason and observation of the natural world, without appeal to scripture or special revelation, distinguished from revealed theology. 1 Doctrinal category (class) Learn More
Knowing God Through Reason and Nature Alone
Natural theology is the project of establishing knowledge of God, or at least grounds for reasonably believing in God, through unaided human reason and observation of the natural world, without appeal to scripture, prophecy or any other form of special revelation, and is traditionally distinguished from revealed theology, which draws its content from a tradition's own scriptures and authoritative teaching. Classical natural theology developed several standard families of argument: cosmological arguments, reasoning from the existence of the universe to a necessary first cause; teleological or design arguments, reasoning from apparent order and purpose in nature to a designing intelligence, most famously stated in William Paley's 1802 image of a watch implying a watchmaker; and ontological arguments, reasoning from the very concept of a maximally perfect being to that being's necessary existence.
Christian, Islamic and Jewish philosophers each developed substantial natural theology traditions, drawing on Aristotelian and Neoplatonic philosophical resources shared across the three traditions, with figures including Thomas Aquinas, Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Maimonides producing some of the most systematically developed versions of these arguments within their respective religious and philosophical contexts.
Objections That Did Not End the Project
Natural theology faced its most serious philosophical challenges in the eighteenth century from David Hume, whose Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion subjected the design argument to sustained critical scrutiny, and Immanuel Kant, whose Critique of Pure Reason argued that all three classical families of argument ultimately depend on the cosmological argument, which in turn depends on an ontological argument Kant held to be invalid, an objection many philosophers since have taken as at least seriously complicating, if not decisively refuting, the classical arguments in their traditional form.
Natural theology nonetheless remains an active field within contemporary philosophy of religion rather than a historical curiosity, with philosophers including Alvin Plantinga and Richard Swinburne developing considerably more sophisticated versions of cosmological, design and other arguments that engage directly with Hume's and Kant's objections, using tools including probability theory and modal logic unavailable to the classical formulations. This atlas records natural theology as a long running and still active philosophical project rather than a settled or abandoned one, with genuine and ongoing disagreement among professional philosophers of religion over how far any of its arguments succeed.
Connections
Associated With
William Herschel framed his 1795 paper on the Sun explicitly within the older natural theology tradition of cosmic pluralism.
Source On the Nature and Construction of the Sun and Fixed StarsWilliam Herschel
Belongs to Tradition
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyEdward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.)
Rejected Here
The American Humanist Association's naturalistic worldview rejects natural theology's attempt to reach God through observation and reason alone.
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Humanists International's member organizations generally reject natural theology as inconsistent with a strictly naturalistic account of the world.
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Karl Barth's 1934 "Nein!" answer to Emil Brunner rejected any independent natural knowledge of God apart from God's own revelation in Jesus Christ.
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Critiqued By
New Atheism, Denominations New Atheist writers including Richard Dawkins have directly targeted natural theology's design arguments as failed reasoning from observation to God.
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Instances
The best known English argument of the natural theology tradition.
Positions on This Question
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Related To
The image of creation as a second scripture is the ground natural theology stands on.
Sources
1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2024View the Source 2. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.