Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Historical Figure

Rudolf Otto

Also Known As Otto
Historians, Ethnographers & Scholars of Religion

German Lutheran theologian and comparativist whose Das Heilige of 1917 gave the study of religion one of its most used words. Otto argued that the holy is not reducible to the good, the beautiful or the rational, and that at its core lies an element for which ordinary language has no term. He coined one, the numinous, from the Latin numen, and described the experience of it as mysterium tremendum et fascinans, a mystery that both terrifies and draws. The book was translated into English in 1923 and has never been out of print.

Facts
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
1869 to 1937 1
Place of Activity
The universities of Gottingen, Breslau and Marburg 2
Manner of Death
Died of natural causes 3
Origins
Place of Origin
Peine, in Hanover 2
Identity
Gender
Male 1
Terminology
Term Coined
Mysterium tremendum et fascinans, his formula for the numinous encounter 1
Term Coined
Numinous, from the Latin numen, for the element in the holy that is not reducible to the moral or the rational 1
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Publications
Notable Publication
Das Heilige, 1917, translated into English in 1923 as The Idea of the Holy 1
Classification
Nationality
Germany 3
Learn More
The Numinous: A Word Coined to Name Something Language Keeps Missing

Otto's problem in Das Heilige is that the word holy has been colonised by ethics. In ordinary use it now means morally perfect, and Otto argues that this is a late refinement covering over an older and stranger content: an encounter with something wholly other, before which the appropriate response is not admiration but a kind of terror mixed with helpless attraction.

Since no available word carried that meaning cleanly, he made one. From the Latin numen, a divine power, he formed the numinous, and he described the experience of it with a Latin formula that has been quoted ever since: mysterium tremendum et fascinans. The mysterium is what cannot be grasped or conceived; the tremendum is the awefulness, the overpoweringness, the sense of one's own nothingness that he called creature feeling; the fascinans is the pull, the strange desire to approach the very thing that appals. He gathered examples from the Hebrew prophets, the book of Job, Luther, the Bhagavad Gita and reports of ordinary people in ordinary places.

The influence has been enormous and the criticism is equally serious. If the holy is a category of its own, irreducible to anything else, then it is insulated by definition from psychological, social or historical explanation, and a critic can reasonably ask whether that is a discovery or a fence. The atlas records both the term, which is genuinely useful, and the objection, which has never been answered to everyone's satisfaction.

Marburg, India and the Comparative Turn

Otto is remembered for one book, and it distorts him. He was a working comparativist who travelled a great deal at a time when most German theologians did not, through North Africa, Egypt, Palestine, India, China and Japan, and much of his output is an attempt to test whether the category he had described in Das Heilige turns up outside Christianity.

His conclusion was that it does. The study he published in 1926 setting the Advaita Vedanta of Shankara beside the German mysticism of Meister Eckhart argues that two thinkers separated by language, century and religion arrive at strikingly parallel structures, and that the parallels are too specific to be accidental. He also produced work on the Bhagavad Gita and on the devotional theism of Ramanuja and Indian bhakti, insisting against the fashion of his day that Indian religion was not exhausted by monism.

He proposed, without much success, an interreligious body he called the Religious League of Mankind, on the model of the League of Nations, which would speak jointly on moral questions without doctrinal agreement. He assembled a collection of religious objects from his travels which became the museum of religion at Marburg, one of the first of its kind. He died in 1937 after a fall from a tower, in circumstances that have never been fully clarified.

Connections

Associated With

Adi Shankara, Figures

Otto's comparative study of 1926 sets the Advaita Vedanta of Shankara beside the mysticism of Meister Eckhart and argues that the parallels are structural rather than accidental.

The other half of Otto's 1926 comparison, in which Eckhart stands for the western form of the same mystical structure.

Belongs to Tradition

Works Attributed

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Das Heilige (The Idea of the Holy)
Rudolf Otto, Trewendt und Granier, 1917
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
3. Wikipedia: Rudolf Otto
Lead section, nationality statement
Quote, Lead section, nationality statement
Rudolf Otto was a German Lutheran theologian, philosopher, and comparative religionist
View the Source
Wikidata: Rudolf Otto
Wikidata Q76748, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.