Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Scholarly Discipline

Archival Research

Humanities
Origin from 1898

The systematic location and evaluation of unpublished institutional records, correspondence and registers held in archives, read in the order the creating institution kept them. Often the only surviving record of an internal dispute a published history omits.

Facts
Subject
Subject
unpublished institutional and personal records, correspondence, registers and administrative papers, read for what they document rather than what they were written to argue 2
Method
Method
systematic location, evaluation and citation of unpublished documents held in archives, following the provenance of the collection that holds them 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
History 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1898 2
Learn More
The Dutch Manual and the Rule That a Record Means Its Own Collection

Archival research is the systematic location and evaluation of unpublished documents, correspondence, registers, administrative papers and personal papers, held in archives rather than published as books. Its foundational method was set out in 1898 by three Dutch archivists, Samuel Muller, Johan Feith and Robert Fruin, in a manual usually called simply the Dutch Manual, which established the principle of respect des fonds, that a record's meaning depends on the collection it was created and kept within and that archivists must preserve that original order rather than reorganizing documents by subject. The manual gave archival work a professional method distinct from library cataloguing and from history writing itself.

Religious institutions are among the heaviest producers of the kind of unpublished record archival research specializes in, parish registers, monastic account books, mission correspondence, diocesan visitation reports and internal denominational minutes, almost none of which was written for publication or for a general reader. Where a tradition's own published history smooths over a controversy or omits a schism, the archival record of the institution's internal correspondence is frequently where the disagreement survives in the participants' own words, which is why the atlas treats archival findings as a distinct and often corrective category of evidence.

Scholarly Disciplines of Archival Research
Connections

Branch Of

Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD

Open Questions Needing This

Source Ignaz von Peczely, Inventor of IridologyEdzard Ernst
Source Periodic Table: GalliumRoyal Society of Chemistry
Source World Religions and Spirituality ProjectDavid G. Bromley (founding director) and the profile authors of record
Source The Spiritualists: The Passion for the Occult in the Nineteenth and Twentieth CenturiesRuth Brandon
Source A Review of the Pearce-Pratt Distance Series of ESP TestsJ. B. Rhine and J. G. Pratt
Sources
1. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
OECD, OECD Publishing, 2015View the Source
2. The Oxford Companion to the Book
Michael F. Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen (editors), Oxford University Press, 2010
Divinity Atlas Scholarly Discipline Register
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.