This page groups sacred sites by whether UNESCO has formally recognized them. Wikipedia notes elsewhere that cultural traditions can be "recognized by UNESCO as Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity," the same kind of international listing that applies to World Heritage sites. Browsing by UNESCO status lets a visitor see which sacred sites carry that international recognition and which do not.
Facts
Overview
What Defines This GroupingSites of the wider Mesoamerican world - the culture area whose societies shared a family of religious ideas expressed in pyramid-temples, ballcourts, a 260-day ritual count and a calendar round - held here where a site cannot be assigned to one of the named traditions the atlas records separately. 2 Peoples and Traditions CoveredUnrelated peoples over three thousand years - Olmec, Zapotec, the builders of Teotihuacan, Maya, Mixtec, Toltec and Mexica among them - speaking languages from several unrelated families, and never one polity, one pantheon or one religion. 2 Origins
Whose Classification This Is"Mesoamerica" is a scholar's category. It was coined by Paul Kirchhoff in 1943 to name the area whose peoples shared a defined list of cultural traits at the time of the Spanish conquest. It is not a name any of those peoples used of themselves, and its boundaries have been argued over ever since. 2 Learn More
Sacred sites of Mesoamerica
This small group gathers a sacred site of the wider Mesoamerican world, the region of central and southern Mexico and Central America whose civilisations shared a family of religious ideas expressed in pyramid-temples and ritual precincts.
The browser will find the site the atlas classes here. The entry describes its religious significance and history within the Mesoamerican tradition.
UNESCO World Heritage Status
Sources
1. Divinity Atlas Directory Taxonomy, First Edition Category Tree
2. Religions of Mesoamerica, 2nd edition
David Carrasco, Waveland Press, 2013
Divinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptions
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.