Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Browse By

Legendary: known from narrative tradition, not the historical record

This page groups mythical creatures by whether anyone has ever claimed they were real. Wikipedia defines a legendary creature as one that "may be featured in historical accounts before modernity, but has not been scientifically shown to exist." Browsing by historicity lets a visitor separate a creature once treated as a real animal from one always understood as symbolic.

Facts
Directory
Category
Mythical Creatures 1
Learn More
Three Beliefs About a Spirit Acting Through a Living Person

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Possessing Spirits gathers three beliefs about a spirit entering and acting through a living person, two from Jewish Kabbalistic tradition that define each other by contrast and one from northeast Africa and the southern Arabian Peninsula.

A dybbuk is a disembodied human spirit that attaches to a living person and speaks through them, understood as the soul of someone who died with sins unatoned and could not be admitted to rest, so the possession is a symptom of the spirit's own trouble rather than a demonic attack; rabbinic accounts, many from the circle around Isaac Luria in Safed, describe a negotiated release rather than a battle. Ibbur is its benign counterpart in the same Lurianic Kabbalah: the soul of a righteous person enters a living one temporarily and with consent, to complete a commandment it left undone or to strengthen the host in a task, the consent and the temporary nature the whole difference from a dybbuk. Zar spirits, held chiefly in Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia and neighboring regions to seize a person, most often a woman, and cause illness or altered behavior, are not exorcised the way a dybbuk might be; instead the possessed person and spirit generally enter an ongoing relationship, the spirit's demands periodically met to keep it appeased, a practice that runs alongside rather than inside the region's major religions.

The grouping's edge is clearest between the two Kabbalistic beliefs, deliberately defined against each other, and least clear against zar, whose ongoing appeasement is a different relationship to possession than either dybbuk or ibbur describes.

Legendary: known from narrative tradition, not the historical record
Filter Results1 entry
Sources
1. Divinity Atlas Directory Taxonomy, First Edition Category Tree
Divinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptions
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.