Home›Possessing Spirits›TraditionBrowse ByTraditionThis page groups mythical creatures by the wider artistic and religious tradition that pictures them. Wikipedia notes that "in medieval art, animals, both real and mythical, played important roles." Browsing by tradition lets a visitor read every creature from one cultural tradition together.FactsLearn MoreTraditionSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsDirectoryCategoryWell-attestedMythical Creatures 1Learn MoreThree Beliefs About a Spirit Acting Through a Living Person This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.Possessing Spirits gathers three beliefs about a spirit entering and acting through a living person, two from Jewish Kabbalistic tradition that define each other by contrast and one from northeast Africa and the southern Arabian Peninsula. A dybbuk is a disembodied human spirit that attaches to a living person and speaks through them, understood as the soul of someone who died with sins unatoned and could not be admitted to rest, so the possession is a symptom of the spirit's own trouble rather than a demonic attack; rabbinic accounts, many from the circle around Isaac Luria in Safed, describe a negotiated release rather than a battle. Ibbur is its benign counterpart in the same Lurianic Kabbalah: the soul of a righteous person enters a living one temporarily and with consent, to complete a commandment it left undone or to strengthen the host in a task, the consent and the temporary nature the whole difference from a dybbuk. Zar spirits, held chiefly in Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia and neighboring regions to seize a person, most often a woman, and cause illness or altered behavior, are not exorcised the way a dybbuk might be; instead the possessed person and spirit generally enter an ongoing relationship, the spirit's demands periodically met to keep it appeased, a practice that runs alongside rather than inside the region's major religions. The grouping's edge is clearest between the two Kabbalistic beliefs, deliberately defined against each other, and least clear against zar, whose ongoing appeasement is a different relationship to possession than either dybbuk or ibbur describes.TraditionFilter Results2 entriesAdherents Today MaximumAll14,800,000 (1)324,000,000 (1)Adherents Today MinimumAll14,800,000 (1)324,000,000 (1)Basis of the Membership FigureAllIndependent Survey (2)Scholarly or Demographic Estimate (1)Establishment StatusAllDeclared Not Established (1)Varies by Province (1)How the Expectation Is EnforcedAllCustomary Norm (2)Membership Figure As OfAll2010-01-01 (1)2012-12-18 (1)2013-01-01 (1)2020-01-01 (2)Origin Period End YearAll400 BCE (2)Origin Period Start YearAll586 BCE (1)500 BCE (1)Position on SexualityAllThe body holds no single settled position; the question is actively and openly contested within it (1)Position on UsuryAllInterest is permitted but bound by ethical constraints against exploiting the poor (1)Practice StatusAllLiving, and practised in varied local forms (1)Partly restricted: some elements are closed to outsiders (1)Standard Rate ExpectedAllTen percent. (1)Status TodayAllLiving tradition, practised today (2)TheologyAllMonotheistic: one God (1)Non-theistic: no creator god is central (1)Show ResultsBrowseCompareBuddhismTradition1 entryJudaismTradition2 entriesSources1. Divinity Atlas Directory Taxonomy, First Edition Category Treetier 1Divinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptionstier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.