Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Browse By

Historically attested

This page groups figures by whether scholars consider them to have actually existed. Wikipedia notes that "the historicity of a claim about the past is its factual status." Browsing by historicity lets a visitor separate a documented historical person from one known only through legend.

Facts
Overview
What Defines This Grouping
A heading of the atlas's own making rather than a category from the study of religion: figures revered for wisdom and teaching rather than for rule, prophecy or miracle. 2
Peoples and Traditions Covered
A cover term over traditions with unrelated criteria for the office: the rishi of Vedic India, the acharya of the Indian schools, the Tirthankara of Jainism, the rabbinic sage, the junzi and the classical masters of China. None of those words is what the English word names, and the heading should not be read as one class of person. 2
Directory
Category
Figures 1
Learn More
The sages

This group gathers sages: figures revered above all for wisdom: teachers, philosophers, seers and learned masters whose insight rather than miracle or rule defines their place in tradition. It is the largest character grouping in the atlas and spans many cultures.

The browser will find the wise figures of many traditions, the rishis of India, the teachers of Chinese thought, the philosophers and holy teachers of other cultures. The entries describe each sage's teaching and the tradition that remembers them.

Historically attested
Filter Results58 entries

Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani

Historically attested

Abdu'l-Baha

Historically attested

Adi Shankara

Historically attested

Akiva ben Joseph

Historically attested

Akka Mahadevi

Historically attested

Al-Ghazali

Historically attested

Andal

Historically attested

Asanga

Historically attested

Atisha

Historically attested

Buddhaghosa

Historically attested

Chaitanya

Historically attested

Chen Tuan

Historically attested

Cheng Yi

Historically attested

Confucius

Historically attested

Dogen

Historically attested

Evagrius Ponticus

Historically attested

George Whitefield

Historically attested

Hadewijch of Antwerp

Historically attested

Hakuin

Historically attested

Heinrich Bullinger

Historically attested

Honen

Historically attested

Huineng

Historically attested

Ibn Abbas

Historically attested

Ibn Taymiyya

Historically attested

Imhotep

Historically attested

Johanan ben Zakkai

Historically attested

Jonathan Edwards

Historically attested

Judah ha-Nasi

Historically attested

Julian of Norwich

Historically attested

Kabir

Historically attested

Kukai

Historically attested

Lalleshwari

Historically attested

Longchenpa

Historically attested

Madhva

Historically attested

Maimonides

Historically attested

Marguerite Porete

Historically attested

Mechthild of Magdeburg

Historically attested

Meister Eckhart

Historically attested

Mencius

Historically attested

Mirabai

Historically attested

Namdev

Historically attested

Peter Bulkeley

Historically attested

Philipp Melanchthon

Historically attested

Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite

Historically attested

Ramakrishna

Historically attested

Ramana Maharshi

Historically attested

Ramanuja

Historically attested

Saicho

Historically attested

Shinran

Historically attested

Thomas a Kempis

Historically attested

Thomas Hooker

Historically attested

Tukaram

Historically attested

Vasubandhu

Historically attested

Vivekananda

Historically attested

Xuanzang

Historically attested

Xunzi

Historically attested

Zhu Xi

Historically attested

Zhuangzi

Historically attested
Sources
1. Divinity Atlas Directory Taxonomy, First Edition Category Tree
2. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005The classification of religious figuresView the Source
Divinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptions
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.