Richard Gombrich's social history is now in a revised second edition, incorporating correction and updated material since the first, a real, checkable sign of sustained scholarly engagement rather than a claim resting on the publisher's name. It traces the documented sangha-laity relationship, the alms economy and temporary ordination practice in Southeast Asia from ancient Benares through to modern Colombo, grounded in the historical and social record rather than doctrinal text alone. This record has not independently traced further scholarly disagreement with Gombrich's specific claims since the second edition. Use it for the social history of the Theravada sangha and its relationship to lay society; a claim resting purely on canonical doctrine needs a dedicated textual source.
Facts
Citation
AuthorRichard Gombrich
PublisherRoutledge
Publication Year2006
URLhttps://www.routledge.com/Theravada-Buddhism-A-Social-History-from-Ancient-Benares-to-Modern-Colombo/Gombrich/p/book/9780415365093
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Richard Gombrich's social history, now in a revised second edition incorporating correction and updated material since the first; it traces the documented sangha-laity relationship and the alms economy from the historical and social record rather than doctrinal text alone. NotesSecond edition. Used for the sangha-laity relationship, the alms economy, and temporary ordination in Southeast Asia.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Asia directly: "ordination practice in Southeast Asia from ancient Benares through to modern Colombo, grounded in the historical and social record rather than doctrinal text alone."
Source Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern ColomboRichard Gombrich
This source names Theravada directly: "Use it for the social history of the Theravada sangha and its relationship to lay society; a claim resting purely on canonical doctrine needs a dedicated textual source."
Source Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern ColomboRichard Gombrich
Claims Backed By This Source (230 claims)
This source backs 230 claims across the atlas. As facts: 135 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 52 holds, 1 connected. Plus 39 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 44 claims: 40 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Organizations, 39 claims: 25 well-attested, 9 holds, 5 general references.
- Figures, 21 claims: 12 well-attested, 6 holds, 3 general references.
- Religious Organization & Structure, 17 claims: 9 well-attested, 6 holds, 2 general references.
- Religious Events, 16 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 4 general references.
- Practices, 15 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Spread Events, 13 claims: 4 well-attested, 8 holds, 1 general references.
- Denominations, 11 claims: 10 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Rituals, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Councils and Synods, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Doctrines, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Disciplines, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Holidays & Festivals, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Cultures, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religious Roles & Titles, 3 claims: 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Empires & Polities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Languages, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Mantras, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Sacred Sound, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
135Religious Organization & Structure
Showing 51 to 63 of 63 entities carrying this claim.
Holds
52Religious Organization & Structure
General References
39Religious Organization & Structure
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.