Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Spread Event

The General Conference Votes No on Regional Ordination Authority in San Antonio

Seventh-day Adventism
Origin from 2015

On 8 July 2015, delegates at the Seventh-day Adventist Church's General Conference Session, meeting at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas, voted by secret ballot on whether division executive committees could decide for themselves whether to ordain women to the gospel ministry within their own territories. The motion, prepared by General Conference officers and division presidents and approved for a vote at the 2014 Annual Council, was defeated 1,381 to 977 with five abstentions, after roughly six hours of floor debate involving forty delegates. The vote closed a five-year debate that had involved the whole denomination; ordination itself remained reserved to men, while women continued to serve the church as commissioned ministers.

Facts
Dates
Start Year
from 2015 1
Status
Established 1
Established marks the General Conference Session's own vote as the church's binding answer to the question, closing a five-year process. It is not an assessment of the arguments made on either side, nor a claim about the extent of women's ministry within the church short of ordination.
Learn More
How the General Conference Voted No on Regional Ordination Authority in San Antonio

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

On 8 July 2015, delegates at the Seventh-day Adventist Church's General Conference Session gathered at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas, to vote by secret ballot on a single question, whether division executive committees could decide for themselves whether to ordain women to the gospel ministry within their own territories.

The motion reaching the floor that day had a long path behind it. General Conference officers and division presidents prepared it, and the 2014 Annual Council approved it for a vote at the next General Conference Session, closing a five year debate that had run across the whole denomination rather than in one region alone.

Roughly six hours of floor debate followed, with forty delegates speaking before the ballots were cast. When the count was read, the motion had been defeated 1,381 to 977, with five abstentions among the delegates present.

The vote left ordination itself reserved to men across every division, with no region gaining the authority to decide otherwise for its own territory. Women continued to serve the church as commissioned ministers, the role the denomination had extended to them short of ordination.

What the San Antonio vote changed for Adventism's spread was closing five years of denomination wide debate over whether regional authority could vary the answer to ordination by territory, settling it with one uniform no rather than a patchwork of separate regional decisions.

Connections

Associated With

This source names Texas directly: "at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas, voted by secret ballot on whether division executive committees could decide for themselves whether to ordain women to the gospel ministry within their own..."

Source Delegates Vote No on Women's Ordination (Inter-American Division)

Occurred In

Source Delegates Vote No on Women's Ordination (Inter-American Division)

Spread Event Of

Closes a 35-year gap since 1991's opening of Adventist mission work in Mongolia, the most recent event already on Seventh-day Adventism's map, with the church's own highest legislative body settling, by vote, a five-year debate over whether ordination policy could vary by region.

Source Delegates Vote No on Women's Ordination (Inter-American Division)
Sources
1. Delegates Vote No on Women's Ordination (Inter-American Division)
Seventh-day Adventist Church, Inter-American Division, 2015View the Source
Seventh-day Adventists Affirm Women in Ministry but Vote Down Ordination (Deseret News)
Deseret News, 2015View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.