Home›Vices›Status Within Tradition›Standard teaching, not formally definedBrowse ByStandard teaching, not formally definedThis page groups vices by their standing within a named list. Wikipedia notes that "in the standard list, the seven deadly sins according to the Catholic Church are wrath, greed, pride, envy, sloth, lust, and gluttony." Browsing by status-within-tradition lets a visitor tell a vice holding a fixed place on a named list from one that does not.FactsLearn MoreStandard teaching, not formally definedSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsOverviewWhat Defines This GroupingWell-attestedFaults a tradition names and warns against, given in its own list with the reason it holds them harmful. The lists are not equivalents: the Latin capital vices are a catalogue of sins ordered by gravity, while the Buddhist and yogic kleshas are an analysis of what obstructs the mind, and neither is a translation of the other. 1Size of the Traditional SetWell-attestedSeven capital vices in the Latin Christian list fixed by Gregory the Great 2OriginsWhose Classification This IsWell-attestedThe familiar seven are Latin Christian. Evagrius Ponticus listed eight evil thoughts in the late fourth century, John Cassian carried them west, and Gregory the Great reduced and reordered them to seven around 590. The list went on moving through the Middle Ages before settling into its modern form. It is not a universal scheme. 3Learn MoreThe Faults the Traditions Warn Against This category holds the vices, the faults that moral and spiritual traditions name and warn against. It gathers the seven deadly sins of Christian teaching: pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath and sloth, each with its Latin name and the demon later tradition attached to it. Each entry gives a vice in the terms the tradition names it, the reason it is held to be harmful, and, where the tradition draws the pairing, the virtue set against it.How traditions count them The seven deadly sins themselves went through several forms before settling into the familiar list: the Western scheme descends from the eight thoughts of Evagrius Ponticus, revised by Gregory the Great into the seven, and the ordering by seriousness varied from one authority to another. The entries note these shifts rather than presenting the list as fixed. The vices connect to the virtues, with which the tradition pairs them, and to the demons that later writers assigned to each. The virtues set against them are treated in their own category.Standard teaching, not formally definedFilter Results35 entriesTraditionAllBuddhism (5)Christianity (7)Hinduism (6)Islam (5)Jainism (4)Judaism (1)Sikhism (5)Opposing VirtueAllAnatta (1)Aparigraha (1)Origin Period Start YearAll375 (6)590 (7)Derived FromAllAvidya (4)Haumai (4)Originates In LanguageAllAncient Greek (4)Arabic (1)Classical Arabic (4)Hebrew (1)Koine Greek (6)Latin (7)Sanskrit (9)Attested InAllThe Yoga Sutras of Patanjali (4)LanguageAllClassical Arabic (5)Gurmukhi / Punjabi (5)Koine Greek (6)Latin (7)Sanskrit (9)Sanskrit and Pali (4)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 35AbhiniveshaStandard teaching, not formally definedAhankar (Ego)Standard teaching, not formally definedAsmitaStandard teaching, not formally definedDvesha (Aversion)Standard teaching, not formally definedEnvy (Invidia)Standard teaching, not formally definedEpithymia (Desire)Standard teaching, not formally definedGhadab (Wrath)Standard teaching, not formally definedGluttony (Gula)Standard teaching, not formally definedGreed / Avarice (Avaritia)Standard teaching, not formally definedHasad (Envy)Standard teaching, not formally definedHedone (Pleasure)Standard teaching, not formally definedIrshya (Envy)Standard teaching, not formally definedKam (Lust)Standard teaching, not formally definedKama (Lust)Standard teaching, not formally definedKibr (Arrogance)Standard teaching, not formally definedKrodh (Anger)Standard teaching, not formally definedKrodha (Anger)Standard teaching, not formally definedLobh (Greed)Standard teaching, not formally definedLobha (Greed)Standard teaching, not formally definedLupe (Distress)Standard teaching, not formally definedLust (Luxuria)Standard teaching, not formally definedMada (Pride)Standard teaching, not formally definedMana (Conceit)Standard teaching, not formally definedMatsarya (Envy)Standard teaching, not formally definedMaya (Deceit)Standard teaching, not formally definedMoh (Attachment)Standard teaching, not formally definedMoha (Delusion)Standard teaching, not formally definedNafs al-Ammara (The Soul That Incites to Evil)Standard teaching, not formally definedPhobos (Fear)Standard teaching, not formally definedPride (Superbia)Standard teaching, not formally definedRaga (Attachment)Standard teaching, not formally definedRiya (Ostentation)Standard teaching, not formally definedSloth (Acedia)Standard teaching, not formally definedWrath (Ira)Standard teaching, not formally definedYetzer Hara (The Evil Inclination)Standard teaching, not formally definedSources1. Encyclopedia of Religiontier 1Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source2. Moralia in Jobtier 1Gregory the Greatbk. XXXI3. The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept, with Special Reference to Medieval English Literaturetier 1Morton W. Bloomfield, Michigan State College Press, 1952View the SourceDivinity Atlas Directory Prose, First Edition Category Descriptionstier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.