On 9 September 2003, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston agreed to pay 85 million dollars to settle claims from 552 alleged victims of clergy sexual abuse, with individual awards ranging from 80,000 to 300,000 dollars depending on the severity and duration of the abuse alleged. Suffolk Superior Court Judge Constance Sweeney approved the finalized agreement on 26 September 2003. The settlement followed Cardinal Bernard Law's resignation in December 2002 and the Boston Globe Spotlight Team's investigation, and was, at the time, the largest known payout by a US diocese to settle abuse claims, a record exceeded four years later by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles's 660 million dollar settlement.
Facts
Inquiry Profile
Kind of Record JurisdictionMassachusetts, United States (Suffolk Superior Court) 1 Publication Year Period Covered, FromThe Boston Globe Spotlight reporting made the clergy abuse crisis public in January 2002, which set off the wave of claims that led to the September 2003 settlement. Period Covered, To Documented Findings
Accused DocumentedThe settlement covered allegations against 140 priests and two others. Victim Estimate Key FindingThe settlement was reached about a month after the archdiocese had first offered 55 million dollars, an amount claimants' attorneys had rejected as inadequate. It resolved more than 500 lawsuits at once rather than proceeding case by case, with the opt in deadline extended to 23 October 2003 and payments expected by 22 December 2003. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Belongs to Tradition
Sources
1. Church Abuse Settlement Finalized
Meghan Dorney, The Boston Pilot, The Boston Pilot, Archdiocese of Boston, 2003View the Source 2. Scores of Priests Involved in Sex Abuse Cases (The Boston Globe, January 31, 2002)
A Settlement in Boston: the Archdiocese Agrees to a Record 85 Million Dollars
Dan Gilgoff, U.S. News and World Report, U.S. News and World Report, archived by BishopAccountability.org, 2003View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.