Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Little Yus Ѧ

Cyrillic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Developed in the late ninth or early tenth century, after the death of Constantine-Cyril, in the First Bulgarian Empire

Little Yus is the thirty-sixth letter of Cyrillic and writes a nasal front vowel, one of the two nasals of Old Church Slavonic. Nearly every later Slavic language lost the nasal vowels, Polish being the principal exception, which makes the yus letters strong evidence that the language written down in the ninth century was a real spoken tongue: nobody constructing a liturgical language afterwards would invent sounds their own speech did not have. In the East Slavic tradition this letter fell together with the iotified a and its shape became the modern Russian ya. It has no numeral value, standing outside the Greek series from which the Cyrillic numbers come.

Facts
Open Questions
Origin of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Little Yus's own description discusses the lost nasal vowel it records, not the origin of its name, and gives none. Covered by the already-live OpenQuestion.
Sense of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Little Yus's own description gives no sense for its name at all. Covered by the already-live OpenQuestion.
Attributions
Associated Sound
A nasal front vowel, the sound Slavists write as a nasal e 1Tradition: Early Cyrillic, the alphabet of Church Slavonic
Origins
Origin Period
Developed in the late ninth or early tenth century, after the death of Constantine-Cyril, in the First Bulgarian Empire 2
Place of Origin
The First Bulgarian Empire, in the school of the disciples of Cyril and Methodius, with Preslav and Ohrid the two centres most often named 2
Identity
Script Type
An alphabet: one letter to a sound, built on Greek uncial letterforms with additional signs, several of them taken from Glagolitic, for the Slavonic sounds Greek could not write 1
Position
The thirty-sixth letter of the Early Cyrillic alphabet in the traditional order 1Tradition: Early Cyrillic, the alphabet of Church Slavonic
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The nasal vowels these letters record were lost from almost every later Slavic language, so their presence in the orthography is evidence for the antiquity of the texts that use them 1Tradition: Early Cyrillic, the alphabet of Church Slavonic
Learn More
The Little Yus: A Nasal Vowel Written Down

The little yus stands thirty sixth and writes a nasal front vowel, one of the two nasal vowels of Old Church Slavonic. It carries no numeral value, standing outside the Greek numeral series like every letter supplied for a sound Greek did not have.

Its name is a Slavist's label rather than a word of the language: little against big, distinguishing the front nasal from the back one. That naming pattern, descriptive rather than lexical, marks the letters that were added last and named by classification.

The sound it wrote is the single strongest piece of evidence for the character of the language the alphabet was made for, and the argument is set out in the companion article.

Its later career was decisive for the modern alphabets. In the East Slavic area the nasal vowel was lost and this letter fell together with the iotified a, and it was this letter's shape that survived the merger, simplified into what is now the Russian letter for ya. The letter therefore did not so much disappear as change what it meant while keeping its form, which is the opposite of what happened to most of its neighbours.

For anyone working on the history of the Slavic languages the letter is a key rather than a curiosity. A word written with the little yus in a Slavonic text can be matched against its descendants in the modern languages, where the nasal has usually resolved into a plain vowel and the nasality survives only in a related word or in a Polish cognate. The Slavonic spelling therefore recovers a stage of the word that no living language preserves intact, and a great deal of Slavic etymology is done by reading modern forms back against exactly these letters.

The Nasal Vowels, and What They Prove

Old Church Slavonic had two nasal vowels, a front one and a back one, and gave each a letter. Almost every Slavic language since has lost them. Polish is the principal exception and still writes two nasal vowels today.

That combination of facts does a particular kind of work. A liturgical language that nobody speaks natively is always open to the suspicion of being a construction, assembled by scholars out of several dialects or out of theory, and the suspicion is not unreasonable given how many liturgical languages are exactly that. The nasal vowels are the answer to it.

Nobody constructing a written language in the ninth century would invent two vowels their own speech did not contain, give each a letter, and then write them consistently in the right places across a large body of translated text. The letters are used systematically, in positions that correspond regularly to nasal vowels reconstructed independently from the comparative evidence of the modern languages, and they line up with what Polish still has. The only economical explanation is that the people writing them were writing what they said.

That makes Old Church Slavonic a record of a real spoken tongue at a datable moment, which is why it matters far beyond liturgy. It is the earliest substantial written Slavic, and the reconstruction of Slavic prehistory rests on it heavily.

The yus letters are the load bearing part of that argument, and it is worth knowing which small marks on a manuscript page are carrying the weight.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Why this is disputed. The little yus writes the nasal front vowel, paired with the big yus's back vowel, and is generally read as adapted from the Glagolitic small yus. The same dispute that applies to big yus applies here: agreement that Cyrillic drew on Glagolitic for this sign, no agreement on whether the Glagolitic form itself has a traceable outside model or is an original invention of its own alphabet's creator.

Derived from This

The iotified little yus is built on the little yus with the glide sign in front of it.

Source Old Church Slavonic GrammarHorace G. Lunt

Originates in Language

Little Yus is a letter of the Early Cyrillic alphabet, which was assembled to write Old Church Slavonic and which takes its letter names from that language.

Source Old Church Slavonic GrammarHorace G. Lunt

Related To

The little yus and the big yus are the two nasal vowels of Old Church Slavonic, front and back. Nearly every later Slavic language lost both, Polish being the principal exception.

Source Old Church Slavonic GrammarHorace G. Lunt

Cyrillic Little Yus writes the same sound and stands in the same place in the Slavonic alphabet. Neither script numbers the letter. Which of the two Slavonic scripts came first, and how much either owes the other, is argued rather than settled.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996on the Slavic alphabets, their letters and their numeral systemsView the Source
2. Byzantine Missions Among the Slavs: SS. Constantine-Cyril and Methodius
Francis Dvornik, Rutgers University Press, 1970on the Moravian mission and the making of the Slavic lettersView the Source
The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Consortiumon the encoded characters, their names and their block assignmentView the Source
Old Church Slavonic Grammar
Horace G. Lunt, Mouton de Gruyter, 2001View the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
Did the opaque letter names at the end of the Slavic alphabets, fert, kher, tsy and sha among them, ever carry a sense in Slavonic?

The first twenty letter names of both Slavic alphabets are ordinary Slavonic words and read together as connected sentences, from azu buky vedi, I know letters, through rtsy slovo tverdo, say the word firmly. After that point the names stop meaning anything recoverable. The reference literature records them as of uncertain or unknown origin and offers no reading. This is not a disagreement between scholars with rival etymologies; it is an absence. Nobody has established whether these names are corrupted Slavonic words, reflexes of Greek letter names, or labels that never meant anything at all, and the question has not been taken up.

What would resolve this A systematic etymological study of the full set of Slavic letter names, working from the earliest abecedaria and from the acrostic alphabet poems of the Old Church Slavonic tradition, which arrange the names in verse and may preserve senses that the plain lists do not. A finding that the names are demonstrably meaningless would settle the question as firmly as a set of etymologies would.
Slavic historical linguistics; Old Church Slavonic philologyPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), The World's Writing Systems
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.