Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Ga ག

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Ga is the third of the thirty consonants and the voiced member of the velar line. In the classical language it was a voiced g; in modern Lhasa Tibetan an initial ga is heard as an unaspirated k with low tone, so the low reading of a syllable is often the only surviving trace of a voiced initial. Ga leads a second life as orthographic machinery: it is one of the five prefixes and one of the ten suffixes, and in both roles it is written without being pronounced as an initial, whether standing before a root letter or closing a syllable such as rig. That double function, a letter of the alphabet and a piece of the spelling system, is the first difficulty a learner of Tibetan orthography meets.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable ga itself, the voiced member of the velar line. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Third of the thirty consonants, and the voiced member of the velar line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
One of the five prefixes and one of the ten suffixes, as well as a root letter 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiced velar stop in Classical Tibetan; an unaspirated k with low tone as an initial in modern Lhasa speech 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Ga leads a second life as orthographic machinery, one of the five prefixes and one of the ten suffixes, written without being pronounced as an initial in either role, which is the first difficulty a learner of Tibetan orthography meets. 2
Learn More
Ga: A Letter and a Piece of Machinery

Ga is the third of the thirty consonants and the voiced member of the velar line. In the classical language it was a voiced g. In modern Lhasa speech an initial ga is heard as an unaspirated k carrying low tone, so the voicing has not survived as voicing; it has been converted into pitch, and the low reading of a syllable is often the only trace left of an initial that used to be voiced.

What sets ga apart from ka and kha is that it works in two systems at once. It is a letter of the recitation, and it is also a piece of the spelling apparatus: one of the five prefixes and one of the ten suffixes. In both of those roles it is written and is not pronounced as an initial. A prefixed ga sits in front of the root letter and does not sound. A suffixed ga closes a syllable, as in rig, and in the modern language it is reduced to little more than an effect on the vowel before it.

This double life is the first serious difficulty in Tibetan orthography, and it has a practical consequence for anyone using a dictionary. Because a written syllable may open with a letter that is not its root, a reader has to identify the root letter before a word can be looked up at all. Ga is one of the letters most often standing in the way, and learning to see past it is the beginning of reading Tibetan spelling rather than merely decoding it.

The Five Prefixes

Five of the thirty letters may stand in front of a root letter as a prefix, the sngon jug: ga, da, ba, ma and the small a. No other letter of the thirty can occupy that slot, and the five are not interchangeable, since which prefix a given root takes is a property of the word and has to be learnt with it.

A prefix is written and is not pronounced. That statement is exact for the modern standard language and is the source of most of the apparent difficulty of Tibetan spelling: a syllable of two spoken sounds may be written with four or five letters, the first of which contributes nothing audible at all. What it does contribute is meaning, because prefixes distinguish words that would otherwise be spelled and spoken alike, and it contributes tone, because a prefix on a syllable can affect the pitch the syllable is given.

They were not always silent. The prefixes are generally understood to record initial consonant clusters that the language once had, and some of those clusters survive today in the dialects of Amdo, where a speaker may still produce a consonant that a Lhasa speaker has lost. Tibetan spelling is therefore conservative in the strict sense: it goes on recording a stage of the language that most speakers no longer pronounce.

The prefix slot is also the reason a Tibetan dictionary cannot be searched from the left. Words are ordered by their root letter, and the prefix is stepped over.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan ga continues the Brahmi ga, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Ga answers to Brahmi Ga, the same voiced velar stop.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.