Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Na ན

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Na is the twelfth of the thirty consonants and the nasal that closes the dental line. It writes a dental nasal made with the tongue tip at the teeth, and it is one of the ten suffixes, closing an enormous number of syllables in ordinary Tibetan. As a suffix it also conditions the vowel before it in modern pronunciation, which is one of the reasons a Tibetan syllable cannot be read off the letters one at a time: the final is part of how the vowel is heard. Na is not among the five prefixes. As an initial it takes low tone in modern Lhasa speech, in company with the other nasals of the sum cu.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable na itself, the nasal that closes the dental line. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Twelfth of the thirty consonants, and the nasal closing the dental line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
One of the ten suffixes, as well as a root letter; not one of the five prefixes 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Dental nasal; as a suffix it also conditions the vowel of the syllable in modern pronunciation 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
As a suffix, na conditions the vowel before it in modern pronunciation, which is one of the reasons a Tibetan syllable cannot be read off its letters one at a time. 2
Learn More
Na and the Dental Nasal

Na is the twelfth of the thirty consonants and the nasal that closes the dental line. It writes a dental nasal, made with the tip of the tongue at the teeth, and as an initial it takes low tone in modern Lhasa speech, in company with the other nasals of the recitation.

It is one of the ten suffixes and closes an enormous number of Tibetan syllables, which makes it one of the letters an eye meets most often. It is not among the five prefixes, so its orthographic work is done entirely at the end of a syllable.

That work is not merely to sit there. In the modern language a final na alters the vowel in front of it, so that the written vowel and the heard vowel differ in a way that depends on the suffix rather than on the vowel sign. A reader therefore cannot take the vowel from the sign alone and add the consonant afterwards. The syllable has to be taken whole.

Na is also, with ra, la, sa and the small a, one of the suffixes that carry grammar rather than lexicon. A great many verb endings and particles of written Tibetan end in it or consist of it, so a reader who has learnt the letter as a sound will meet it far more often as a piece of sentence structure.

With na the third of the four regular lines closes. After it the labials run the same pattern through for the fourth and last time, and the recitation then moves into the part of the alphabet that Tibetan built for itself rather than inherited.

Why a Tibetan Syllable Cannot Be Read One Letter at a Time

A reader of an alphabet learns to convert letters into sounds in order and assemble the result. That method fails on Tibetan, and understanding why is most of what separates decoding the script from reading it.

Four things get in the way. The first letter written may be a prefix, contributing no sound. The letter above the root may be a superscript, likewise silent, and both of them may instead be affecting the tone of the whole syllable rather than adding anything of their own. The vowel is written on the root and is then modified by whatever suffix follows, so it cannot be settled until the end of the syllable has been reached. And the tone, which in the modern language carries much of the distinction between words, is a property of the entire stack computed from several of its parts at once.

The consequence is that a Tibetan syllable is read as a unit. An experienced reader takes in the stack, identifies the root letter, and produces a syllable whose sound and pitch follow from the whole arrangement. The tsheg, the small raised dot between syllables, is what makes this possible at speed: it says where one unit ends, so the eye is never in doubt about how much to take in at once.

None of this makes the script irregular. The rules are consistent and there are not many of them. They simply operate on the syllable rather than on the letter.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan na continues the Brahmi na, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Na answers to Brahmi's dental Na, the nasal that closes the dental line in both scripts.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.