Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Ushenna ࡅ

Also Known As Ushenna
Mandaic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin The script took shape between the second and the seventh century CE

Ushenna is the sixth letter of the Mandaic alphabet and writes the vowel u as well as the consonant w. With halqa and aksa it makes up the set of three full vowel letters that makes Mandaic a true alphabet rather than an abjad, a difference from Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic that is easy to state and hard to overstate: a Mandaic word carries its vowels in the line of letters rather than in points above and below it. Ushenna joins on both sides. A separate vocalization mark can be added to distinguish vowel quality, and teaching materials use it far more than ordinary writing does.

Facts
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Mandaean texts are transmitted in manuscripts copied by priestly scribes, whose colophons record the chain of copyists standing behind each copy 3Tradition: Mandaean scribal transmission
Disputed
A Rival System's Attribution
The script's ancestry is assigned either to a cursive form of Aramaic, the derivation favored by most script historians, or to the Parthian chancery script used in Sasanian era administrative documents. 4Tradition: The Mandaic script
Both derivations are held in the literature and neither has displaced the other. The Aramaic cursive camp points to the letterforms' overall resemblance to other late Aramaic cursive scripts of the region, including Nabataean and Syriac; the Parthian chancery camp points to specific letterforms, including certain medial and final forms, that resemble Pahlavi documentary hands more closely than any Aramaic cursive exemplar. No single find has settled the question, and Mandaic paleography treats it as open pending further comparative work.
Attributions
Associated Sound
The vowel u and the consonant w, written as a full letter 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Origins
Origin Period
The script took shape between the second and the seventh century CE 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Place of Origin
Lower Mesopotamia, among the Mandaean communities of southern Iraq and south-western Iran 3Tradition: The Mandaic script
Origin of the Name
Most letter names are formed from the letter's own sound with a preceding a, and do not continue the Northwest Semitic nouns that stand behind the Hebrew and Syriac names 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The alphabet is called the abagada after its opening letters, and the traditional count of twenty-four is reached by adding the digraph adu and then writing the first letter again at the end 2Tradition: The Mandaic alphabet
Identity
Script Type
A true alphabet rather than an abjad: halqa, ushenna and aksa are full letters for the vowels a, u and i, where the related Semitic scripts write consonants and point the vowels 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Position
Sixth of the twenty-two inherited letters 2Tradition: The Mandaic script
How the Letter Joins
Joins on both sides, taking initial, medial, final and isolated shapes 1Tradition: The Mandaic script
Practice
Liturgical and Scriptural Role
Classical Mandaic, written in this script, is the liturgical language of the Mandaean religion; the community is small and now largely in diaspora, and its priestly knowledge is not open material 3Tradition: Mandaeism
Open Questions
Sense of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Ushenna's own description discusses its dual vowel/consonant value but names no sense for the name itself; its own entry names ushenna by name among the alphabet's irregular names.
Learn More
Ushenna: The Mandaic Letter

Ushenna is the sixth letter of the Mandaic alphabet and writes the vowel u as well as the consonant w. It joins on both sides.

With halqa and aksa it makes up the set of three full vowel letters that makes Mandaic a true alphabet rather than an abjad. A separate vocalization mark can be added to distinguish vowel quality, and teaching materials use it far more than ordinary writing does.

Its name is one of the handful in the alphabet that does not follow the pattern of the sound with a preceding a, and the irregular names are a group worth noticing: ushenna, aksa, it, in, dushenna and kad.

Ushenna holds the sixth place, where waw stands in the inherited Aramaic sequence. The neighbouring alphabets use their sixth letter as a partial vowel sign, one of the letters described as mothers of reading, which can stand for a long u or o beside its consonantal value. Mandaic went further with the same letter and made it a vowel outright. The difference between a letter that may indicate a vowel and a letter that is one sounds small and changes what the script is: an abjad leaves the vowels to the reader, and Mandaic does not.

Because ushenna writes both a vowel and a consonant, a word containing it does not tell a reader on sight which is meant, and that is one of the few residual ambiguities left in a script that otherwise removes them. The vocalization mark exists to settle it and is commonly absent, so the reader supplies the answer from knowing the word.

Ushenna and an Alphabet That Writes Its Vowels

Almost every script descended from the Northwest Semitic alphabet is an abjad. It writes consonants, and the reader supplies the vowels from knowing the language. Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic all work this way, and all three later developed elaborate systems of points and marks to write the vowels in when it mattered, for scripture, for teaching, for poetry.

Mandaic is the exception in its immediate family. Three of its letters, halqa, ushenna and aksa, are full vowel letters for a, u and i. They are not points, they are not optional marks, and they are not consonants doing double duty; they sit in the line with everything else. A Mandaic word is written with its vowels in it.

Why this happened is not something the atlas can settle, and speculation about it is easy to find and hard to check. What can be said is what it does. It makes the script easier to read without training than its neighbours, it removes the ambiguity that unpointed Hebrew and Syriac carry, and it means that a Mandaic manuscript preserves the vowels of the language as its scribes pronounced them, which is evidence about the language that unpointed scripts simply do not supply.

The vocalization mark that can distinguish vowel quality is a refinement on top of that, used mainly in teaching. It is not doing the job that Hebrew and Syriac pointing does, because that job is already done by the letters.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Related To

Mandaic Ushenna and Hebrew Vav occupy the same place in the twenty-two letter Aramaic sequence. Hebrew keeps the inherited noun as the letter name and the numeral value 6; Mandaic keeps neither. Where the Mandaic shapes came from is disputed, a cursive Aramaic hand or the Parthian chancery script.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Mandaic Ushenna and Syriac Waw hold the same place in the twenty-two letter Aramaic sequence both alphabets inherited. The shapes are unrelated to look at, so it is the order that carries the descent. Where the Mandaic shapes came from is disputed, a cursive Aramaic hand or the Parthian chancery script.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. The Mandaeans: Ancient Texts and Modern People
Jorunn Jacobsen Buckley, Oxford University Press, 2002View the Source
4. Iranian Scripts for Aramaic Languages: The Origin of the Mandaic Script
Charles G. Haberl, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 341, pp. 53 to 62, 2006View the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
Do Mandaic's irregularly named letters (halqa, ushenna, it, aksa, in, ash) carry an inherited sense, or are they labels of a different kind?

Most Mandaic letters are named by their own sound with a preceding a (ab, ag, ad...), and their own descriptions state plainly this is a pronunciation label rather than an inherited word with a sense, unlike the Northwest Semitic nouns Hebrew and Syriac kept for the same slots. Six letters break that regular pattern by their own descriptions' own account (Its own text names the set: ushenna, aksa, dushenna, kad and it itself; In and Ash are separately marked as built on a different vowel or sound), and Dushenna and Kad, two of the six, already carry attested senses because they are documented ligatures of a real Aramaic word. The other four, plus Halqa, the very first letter and one of the script's three true vowel signs, whose name is equally outside the regular pattern, have no sense offered by any source consulted, and none of their descriptions states this as a settled absence either.

What would resolve this A study of Mandaic's own manuscript and liturgical tradition for these specific six names, checked against Mandaic vocabulary and against the older Aramaic sequence's inherited nouns for the same six slots (Aleph, Waw, Heth, Yod, Ayin, Shin), beyond what the general reference literature already surveys.
Mandaic studies; comparative Aramaic philologyThe Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.