Angelic Choirs
Angels
Dionysian Choirs
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 480 to 530 CE
The Angels are the ninth and last choir of the Dionysian hierarchy, nearest to humanity and the material world. They are the ordinary messengers, the word angel itself meaning messenger, and among them are the guardian angels assigned to individuals, who carry prayers upward and providence downward. In the Kabbalistic correspondence used here they are aligned with Yesod, the sphere of the Foundation.
Facts
Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryA standard analytic category in the study of religion 2 What is superseded is the authorship, not the scheme Debunked
Attributed Author / CompilerRenaissance scholars established that the ascription could not be genuine: the place of origin recorded elsewhere on this page places the work's actual composition in Greek, in Syria, around the year 500, some four centuries after Dionysius the Areopagite would have lived. Bernard McGinn's The Foundations of Mysticism: Origins to the Fifth Century (Crossroad, 1991) treats the ascription's rejection as settled since the Renaissance. 2 Attributed Author / CompilerThe Celestial Hierarchy, which sets out the ninefold order of angels including this choir, circulated under the name of Dionysius the Areopagite, the Athenian convert of Paul named at Acts 17:34. Bernard McGinn's The Foundations of Mysticism: Origins to the Fifth Century (Crossroad, 1991) traces how this ascription gave the work the standing of a companion of the apostles. 2 Attributed Author / CompilerThe true author's identity has never been recovered. Bernard McGinn's The Foundations of Mysticism: Origins to the Fifth Century (Crossroad, 1991) is among the scholarship that refers to him only as Pseudo-Dionysius, a name that records the unmasking of the Areopagite ascription rather than identifying who he actually was. 2 Origins
Origin Period480 to 530 CE 1Tradition: Pseudo-Dionysius, The Celestial Hierarchy Origin Period Origin PeriodThe general term for a messenger-spirit runs throughout the Hebrew Bible and New Testament and long predates Dionysius; as the specific NINTH and lowest rank of a formal ninefold hierarchy it is organized in The Celestial Hierarchy, dated by modern scholarship to the late fifth or early sixth century CE and traditionally, but wrongly, attributed to Dionysius the Areopagite (hence Pseudo-Dionysius). 1 Place of OriginWritten in Greek, most probably in Syria, around the year 500. 2 Origin of the NameGreek angelos, simply a messenger 3 Origin of the NameThe ordinary word for a human envoy as well as a heavenly one 3 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceMost immediately concerned with the world and the guidance of human beings 1Tradition: Pseudo-Dionysius, The Celestial Hierarchy Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe last of the nine orders 1Tradition: Pseudo-Dionysius, The Celestial Hierarchy Attributions
SephirahYesod, in the table of the ten orders in Agrippa's Three Books of Occult Philosophy 4Tradition: Agrippa Sourced to the subject's own accountAgrippa's table of the ten orders was collated directly for this entry. It runs Kether to the Seraphim, Chokmah to the Cherubim, Binah to the Thrones, Chesed to the Dominions, Geburah to the Powers, Tiphereth to the Virtues, Netzach to the Principalities, Hod to the Archangels and Yesod to the Angels, and gives Malkuth not to a choir but to the blessed souls. The arrangement this collection carries elsewhere in its own structure runs one place lower, from Chokmah down to Malkuth, and matches neither Agrippa nor the Golden Dawn table. Whose arrangement that is has never been recorded, which is what the open question below asks. Rival Systems
A Rival System's AttributionSourced to the subject's own accountAgrippa, Three Books of Occult Philosophy: Angels is the order of Yesod, not of Malkuth. The order Agrippa assigns to Malkuth is the animastic souls, whose Hebrew name he gives as Issim. 4Tradition: Agrippa, Three Books of Occult Philosophy A Rival System's AttributionEvery scheme, Dionysian or Gregorian, agrees Angels sit at the lowest rank, closest to the human world; the two orderings diverge on which ranks sit above it, not on this one. 1 A Rival System's AttributionSourced to the subject's own accountHermetic Order of the Golden Dawn: the choir of Malkuth is Ashim. The order's ten choirs are the Hebrew orders throughout, and Angels does not appear among them. 5Tradition: Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Learn More
A Choir of the Celestial Hierarchy
Angels is one of the nine choirs, or orders, of angels described in The Celestial Hierarchy, a treatise written around the late fifth or early sixth century by the anonymous Christian author known as Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. That work arranges the angels in three triads: the highest of Seraphim, Cherubim and Thrones; the middle of Dominions, Virtues and Powers; and the lowest of Principalities, Archangels and Angels. The scheme drew together the various ranks named in scripture, the seraphim of Isaiah, the cherubim of Genesis and Ezekiel, and the thrones, dominions, principalities and powers listed in the Pauline epistles, into a single ordered hierarchy that became standard in medieval Christian theology and was carried further by Thomas Aquinas and by Dante. This entry describes Angels as a figure of that documented theological and literary tradition.
The Greek angelos simply means "messenger" and, in its most general sense, names the whole created order of these beings rather than any single rank; Pseudo-Dionysius narrows the common word to the ninth and lowest choir specifically, the rank he holds to stand closest to humanity and most directly engaged with individual human affairs, including, in later tradition though not explicitly in his own text, the office of personal guardian angels assigned to particular people rather than to nations or nature.
The Kabbalistic Correspondence
In this collection Angels is also correlated with a sephirah of the Tree of Life, here Malkuth ("Kingdom"). Mapping the angelic choirs onto the ten sephiroth of Kabbalah is not part of the original Dionysian scheme; it is a later development of Christian Kabbalah, given its now-familiar form by the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which paired each sephirah with a divine name, an archangel and an angelic choir. The correspondence is presented here as a documented feature of that esoteric system, distinct from the Christian theology of Pseudo-Dionysius and from the Jewish sources of the Tree of Life, and not as the doctrine of any single tradition.
This collection places Angels at Malkuth, Kingdom, the physical world itself in Kabbalistic cosmology, one sphere below the Agrippa-attributed sequential table's placement at Yesod, the last step in the consistent shift running through this entire set of six choirs. The Golden Dawn's own Hebrew table gives Malkuth to a host it calls Ishim, "souls" or "men," dropping the name Angels even though Malkuth's association with the physical, human world makes it, of all ten spheres, the one where a name meaning simply "messengers to humanity" would fit best.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
1. The Celestial Hierarchy
2. The Foundations of Mysticism: Origins to the Fifth Century
Bernard McGinn, Crossroad, 1991on the reception of the Dionysian corpus in Latin theology
3. The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 1611the ordinary usage of angelos throughout the New TestamentView the Source 4. Three Books of Occult Philosophy
5. The Golden Dawn: The Original Account of the Teachings, Rites, and Ceremonies of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, 6th edition
Israel Regardie, Llewellyn, 1989Second Knowledge Lecture: the sephiroth with their divine names, archangels and choirs of angelsView the Source A Dictionary of Angels, Including the Fallen Angels
Essays About This Entity (3 essays)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.