Arabic Parts
Part of Marriage
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 75 to 378 CE
Signifies marriage and committed partnership. Several incompatible formulae are in circulation and there is no settled version; the one stored here is the formula Paulus Alexandrinus gives for a man's chart, with Venus and Saturn exchanged for a woman's. That gendered split is an assumption of the fourth-century source rather than a technical requirement, and modern practitioners who use the lot at all mostly do not apply it. Others discard the lot entirely on the grounds that the competing formulae cannot all be right and there is no basis for choosing between them.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period75 to 378 CE 1Tradition: Hellenistic astrology in Greco-Roman Egypt Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account800 to 1300 CE 2Tradition: Arabic and Latin medieval astrology Place of Origin Origin of the Name"Arabic Parts" is a misnomer. These are the Hellenistic lots, Greek kleroi, already in use by Dorotheus, Vettius Valens and Paulus Alexandrinus centuries before any Arabic author. What the Arabic tradition did was multiply them and transmit them to Latin Europe 3 Learn More
The Lot of Marriage, and the Problem of the Medieval Lots
The Lot of Marriage is one of the lots that multiplied in the medieval Arabic and Latin tradition, where the small Hellenistic set of seven expanded enormously; Guido Bonatti in the thirteenth century lists ninety-seven parts, and later compilations list more. The expansion followed a simple rule of thumb, that a lot could be made for any topic by taking the arc between the two natural significators of that topic and projecting it from the Ascendant, and once that rule was accepted the number of possible lots was unlimited. Marriage is a clear case of what went wrong: several incompatible formulae are in circulation, differing in whether Venus and Saturn are taken in one order or the other and in whether the sect reversal applies, and there is no settled version. The one stored here is a common form, but a reader who finds a different figure elsewhere is not necessarily looking at an error.
The disagreement is not a defect in the transmission so much as a consequence of how the lots spread. The Hermetic core is small and its formulae are stable, because each lot in it is tied to a planet and to Fortune or Spirit in a fixed pattern. The lots that accumulated afterwards, in the Persian and Arabic material and then in the Latin compilations, were built ad hoc for particular questions, and nothing in the doctrine constrained two authors asking the same question to reach for the same planets. A reader meeting a lot of marriage in a modern text should therefore look for the formula printed beside it, and treat its absence as a reason for caution rather than as an omission of a detail everybody knows.
The Arithmetic of Marriage: The Lot That Never Settled
The day formula stored for this lot is Ascendant plus Venus minus Saturn. It is a plain lot with no other lot inside it, so nothing cancels and nothing doubles: one Ascendant, one fast-ish planet and one very slow one.
Its motion is therefore the Ascendant's, almost exactly. Venus adds about one degree a day and Saturn subtracts about two minutes of arc, so the lot advances one degree every three minutes and fifty nine seconds. A birth time good to the minute gives a placement good to a degree; a birth time given to the nearest quarter hour does not fix the degree, though it will usually fix the sign.
The arithmetic is the least of the difficulties with this lot, and this page's own description already records the reason: several incompatible formulae for a lot of marriage circulate, differing in which planets are used and in whether the terms reverse by sect. The formula above is the one this atlas stores. Any comparison of two marriage lots from two sources should begin by establishing that they are the same construction, because two lots bearing the same name and built from different planets are not two opinions about one point, they are two different points.
That is a general caution about the medieval expansion of the doctrine rather than about this lot alone. Bonatti transmits a very large number of lots, and the further from the Hermetic core a lot sits, the less agreement there is about how to build it.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
1. Introduction to Astrology (Eisagogika)
Paulus Alexandrinus, 378On the lots, their calculation and their reversal by sectQuote, On the lots, their calculation and their reversal by sect
Paulus sets out the sect-reversed formulae, including the night anchor for the Lot of Exaltation and the gendered marriage formulae.
2. Liber Astronomiae
Guido Bonatti, The Golden Hind Press, 1277the parts, and the ninety-seven parts of the Liber AstronomiaeView the Source 3. A History of Western Astrology
Nicholas Campion, Continuum, 2009vol. 1, on the formation of horoscopic astrology in Greco-Roman EgyptView the Source Christian Astrology
William Lilly, Thomas Brudenell, London, 1647the part of marriage and its variant formulaeView the Source Carmen Astrologicum
Dorotheus of Sidon, 75Book I and Book II, on marriage, children and the parentsQuote, Book I and Book II, on marriage, children and the parents
The earliest surviving layer of delineation for the lots of family matters, transmitted through Persian and Arabic intermediaries.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.