Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Arabic Parts

Part of Sickness

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 75 to 378 CE

Signifies illness and bodily affliction, taken from Mars and Saturn, the two planets this tradition counts as malefic. Medical astrology of this kind was mainstream practice into the seventeenth century and is not a basis for any judgement about actual health.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
75 to 378 CE 1Tradition: Hellenistic astrology in Greco-Roman Egypt
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
800 to 1300 CE 2Tradition: Arabic and Latin medieval astrology
Place of Origin
Greco-Roman Egypt 3
Origin of the Name
"Arabic Parts" is a misnomer. These are the Hellenistic lots, Greek kleroi, already in use by Dorotheus, Vettius Valens and Paulus Alexandrinus centuries before any Arabic author. What the Arabic tradition did was multiply them and transmit them to Latin Europe 3
Language
Ancient Greek 3
Learn More
The Lot of Sickness

The Lot of Sickness is taken from Mars and Saturn, the two planets the classical tradition counts as malefic, and it belongs to the medical astrology that formed a major branch of the art from antiquity until the seventeenth century. Physicians in medieval and Renaissance Europe were commonly trained in it: the timing of bleeding and purging by the Moon's sign, the decumbiture chart cast for the moment a patient took to bed, and the melothesia that assigns parts of the body to the signs were all standard practice, and William Lilly devotes a substantial part of Christian Astrology to medical questions. That history is worth recording as history. It is also worth stating plainly that astrological diagnosis has no evidential support and that this material is preserved here as part of the record of medicine and of astrology, not as guidance about health.

Mars and Saturn are the two planets the whole classical tradition, not only the theory of lots, counts as malefic by nature, and their pairing for the Lot of Sickness follows the same logic of natural significators used throughout the family and topical lots: the planets whose nature most resembles the matter in question are combined to locate it in the chart. Because both contributing planets are malefic, some medieval sources treat the Lot of Sickness as needing no sect reversal at all, on the reasoning that a lot built from two planets of the same basic nature has no obvious "worse" or "better" arrangement to preserve by reversing the day and night terms, unlike lots such as Fortune or Spirit that combine one luminary of each sect.

The Arithmetic of Sickness: Mars Against Saturn

The day formula stored for this lot is Ascendant plus Mars minus Saturn, the two classical malefics set against each other and projected from the horizon.

Neither planetary term moves quickly. Mars covers about 31 minutes of arc a day at mean motion and much less near a station, and Saturn about two minutes, so the pair contribute roughly half a degree a day between them. The lot therefore travels with the Ascendant, one degree every four minutes and one sign every two hours, and it needs a birth time recorded to the minute before its degree is worth quoting.

The construction is the point of interest. The arc from Saturn to Mars is the elongation between the two bodies the tradition holds responsible for affliction of different kinds, Saturn for the chronic, cold and obstructive and Mars for the acute, hot and violent. The lot marks that arc out from the horizon, so it is not a lot of either malefic but of the distance between them.

Because Mars can be retrograde for roughly two months in every twenty six, and because Saturn is retrograde for about four and a half months a year, the elongation does not advance steadily and can hold nearly still or reverse for weeks at a time. For a group of people born within such a period the planetary component of the lot is effectively frozen, and the whole difference between their lots is the difference in what was rising.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Originates in Language

Source A History of Western AstrologyNicholas Campion
Sources
1. Introduction to Astrology (Eisagogika)
Paulus Alexandrinus, 378on the lots
2. Liber Astronomiae
Guido Bonatti, The Golden Hind Press, 1277the part of sicknessView the Source
3. A History of Western Astrology
Nicholas Campion, Continuum, 2009vol. 1, on the formation of horoscopic astrology in Greco-Roman EgyptView the Source
Christian Astrology
William Lilly, Thomas Brudenell, London, 1647the doctrine of decumbiture and medical judgmentView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.