Home›Articles›A Verse Added Later, and What It ChangedArticlesA Verse Added Later, and What It ChangedCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Verse Added Later, and What It Changed." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/1-john-a-verse-added-later-and-what-it-changed.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Verse Added Later, and What It Changed. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/1-john-a-verse-added-later-and-what-it-changedCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-verse-added-later-and-what-it-changed, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Verse Added Later, and What It Changed}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/1-john-a-verse-added-later-and-what-it-changed}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Verse Added Later, and What It Changed 1 John supplies one of the clearest and best documented cases of a textual addition in the entire New Testament: the Comma Johanneum, a phrase explicitly naming the Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit as three heavenly witnesses, is absent from every Greek manuscript earlier than the late medieval period and from every translation made directly from early Greek texts, appearing first in Latin theological writing and only later inserted into some Latin Vulgate manuscripts and, through them, into the Greek Textus Receptus that underlies the King James Version. Its absence from the early manuscript record is not seriously disputed by textual scholars of any theological position, Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant alike, and modern translations based on critical Greek editions omit it or mark it as a later addition, though it remains printed without comment in Bibles that follow the King James or the Textus Receptus tradition. Because the verse offered a uniquely explicit trinitarian formula, its removal from modern critical texts has occasionally been treated in popular discussion as an attack on trinitarian doctrine itself, though the doctrine rests on the cumulative witness of many other New Testament passages and does not depend on this one contested verse, a point textual scholars across denominational lines make consistently.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle On1 John, Scripture Portions Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year