Home›Articles›Cloth For The Clan, Not Only For The HouseholdArticlesCloth For The Clan, Not Only For The HouseholdCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Cloth For The Clan, Not Only For The Household." Accessed September 1, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/abusua-pa-cloth-for-the-clan-not-only-for-the-household.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Cloth For The Clan, Not Only For The Household. Retrieved September 1, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/abusua-pa-cloth-for-the-clan-not-only-for-the-householdCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-cloth-for-the-clan-not-only-for-the-hous, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Cloth For The Clan, Not Only For The Household}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/abusua-pa-cloth-for-the-clan-not-only-for-the-household}, note = {Accessed September 1, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreCloth For The Clan, Not Only For The Household Willis records Abusua Pa standing for family unity and for the value of belonging to a well functioning kin group whose members support one another, and notes that because abusua membership shaped so much of traditional Akan social and economic life, inheritance, obligation, identity, the symbol carries weight well beyond a general sentiment about family closeness that a comparable design in a less kinship-structured society might carry. He distinguishes it from Fihankra's architectural image of communal security, noting Abusua Pa names the social bonds of the matrilineal clan specifically rather than the physical structure that might house its members, the two symbols addressing family and household from two related but distinct angles, one social and one architectural. Willis records Abusua Pa commissioned specifically for cloth marking family gatherings, funerals, and occasions reaffirming clan identity and obligation, distinguishing this collective, lineage-oriented use from the more individually or maritally focused occasions that carry symbols such as Duafe or Kete Pa. Willis treats this collective, lineage-oriented use as distinct from, rather than a variation on, the corpus's more individually and maritally focused family symbols.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnAbusua Pa, Adinkra Symbols Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year