Home›Articles›Separation, Persian Rule and a Church's Own CouncilsArticlesSeparation, Persian Rule and a Church's Own CouncilsArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Separation, Persian Rule and a Church's Own Councils." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/ace-twocouncils-persianrule-history.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Separation, Persian Rule and a Church's Own Councils. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/ace-twocouncils-persianrule-historyCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-separation-persian-rule-and-a-church-s-o, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Separation, Persian Rule and a Church's Own Councils}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/ace-twocouncils-persianrule-history}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreSeparation, Persian Rule and a Church's Own Councils The Church of the East's rejection of Ephesus in 431 did not leave it without any conciliar life of its own, only without any further councils it recognised as binding on the wider Christian world's faith. The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity records that the church went on holding its own synods, most notably at Seleucia-Ctesiphon in Persian territory, gatherings that settled matters of canon law, clerical discipline and church administration for a community that found itself, after the separation, outside the Roman Empire's borders entirely and under first Persian Sasanian and later Islamic rule. That political location shaped the separation as much as theology did: a church whose faithful lived under a rival empire to Rome had practical reasons, well documented by historians of the period, to distance itself from a christological formula tied to the emperor's own church, whatever the formula's theological merits. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church notes that this history left the Church of the East doctrinally settled at 381 in a technical sense while remaining administratively and liturgically alive across Persia, Central Asia and eventually as far as China through missionary expansion, a church whose creed stopped growing centuries before its geography did.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Two Ecumenical Councils as the Complete Dogmatic Deposit, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian ChristianityChristoph Baumertier 1SourcesThe Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianitytier 1Christoph Baumer, I. B. Tauris, London, 2006The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity, on Seleucia-Ctesiphon and the church's own synodsThe Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editiontier 1F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, on the church's doctrinal history closing at 381 while its geography kept expandingView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year