Home›Articles›Two Natures, Two Qnome, One ParsopaArticlesTwo Natures, Two Qnome, One ParsopaArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Two Natures, Two Qnome, One Parsopa." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/ace-twoqnome-christology-formula.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Two Natures, Two Qnome, One Parsopa. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/ace-twoqnome-christology-formulaCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-two-natures-two-qnome-one-parsopa, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Two Natures, Two Qnome, One Parsopa}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/ace-twoqnome-christology-formula}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreTwo Natures, Two Qnome, One Parsopa The Church of the East confesses that in Christ there are two kyane, natures, divine and human, and two qnome, united in a single parsopa, the term used for the one subject who is Christ. The "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable Misnomer stresses that qnoma, the individual concrete reality a nature takes in an existing thing, is not the same idea as the Greek hypostasis that the Chalcedonian formula uses, even though translators have often rendered both as person, a choice that produced the charge that this church teaches two separate sons, one divine and one human, joined only loosely. The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity records that the church has always denied teaching any such thing, insisting that the one parsopa is the single subject, the single Christ who acts, suffers and is worshipped, so that two qnome describes what each nature concretely is rather than describing two persons standing side by side. The formula sits apart from both major alternatives that dominate the history of the fifth century christological controversies, neither the Chalcedonian statement of two natures in one hypostasis nor the miaphysite statement of a single incarnate nature, making it a genuinely third position rather than a variant reading of either.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnTwo Qnome in One Parsopa, the Christology of the Church of the East, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source The "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable MisnomerSebastian P. Brocktier 1SourcesThe "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable Misnomertier 1Sebastian P. Brock, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 1996The "Nestorian" Church: A Lamentable Misnomer, on qnoma against the Greek hypostasisThe Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianitytier 1Christoph Baumer, I. B. Tauris, London, 2006The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity, on the two-qnome christology as a third positionComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year