Home›Articles›Third of Ten, and the Thrones ProblemArticlesThird of Ten, and the Thrones ProblemCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Third of Ten, and the Thrones Problem." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/aralim-third-of-ten-and-the-thrones-problem.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Third of Ten, and the Thrones Problem. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/aralim-third-of-ten-and-the-thrones-problemCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-third-of-ten-and-the-thrones-problem, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Third of Ten, and the Thrones Problem}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/aralim-third-of-ten-and-the-thrones-problem}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThird of Ten, and the Thrones Problem Maimonides places the erelim third of ten in the Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah 2:7, and the Golden Dawn table assigns them to Binah, the third sephirah. On rank the two agree. The friction is with the Christian scheme. Western reference works very often equate the erelim with the Thrones, the third choir of the Dionysian hierarchy, on the strength of the shared position and nothing else. The equation is a matching made across two systems rather than a claim either system makes, and it competes with a second identification that assigns the Thrones to the ophanim, the wheels of Ezekiel, which this collection records on its own Thrones row. Both cannot be the primary reading, and neither Pseudo-Dionysius nor Maimonides was writing with the other list in view. The practical warning is for anyone reading a correspondence table. A table that prints Thrones beside Aralim is reporting an alignment made by a later compiler, and a table that prints Thrones beside Auphanim is reporting a different one. Neither table usually says which it is doing. Treating either as the meaning of the rank imports a whole scheme of Christian angelology into a Hebrew list that developed without it, and the reverse import happens just as readily in the other direction, which is why the atlas records the position and the equation as separate claims.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnAralim, Angelic Choirs Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year