Home›Articles›A Symbolic, Non-Supernatural ReligionArticlesA Symbolic, Non-Supernatural ReligionCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Symbolic, Non-Supernatural Religion." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/atheistic-satanism-satan-as-symbol-of-the-self-a-symbolic-non-supernatural-religion.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Symbolic, Non-Supernatural Religion. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/atheistic-satanism-satan-as-symbol-of-the-self-a-symbolic-non-supernatural-religionCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-symbolic-non-supernatural-religion, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Symbolic, Non-Supernatural Religion}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/atheistic-satanism-satan-as-symbol-of-the-self-a-symbolic-non-supernatural-religion}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Symbolic, Non-Supernatural Religion This symbolic Satanism, articulated by Anton LaVey's Church of Satan (founded 1966) and, in a different key, by The Satanic Temple (founded 2013), is sharply distinct from theistic Satanism, which treats Satan as a real being. The two atheistic organisations themselves differ markedly (the Church of Satan emphasising individualism and self-interest, The Satanic Temple emphasising compassion, reason, and activism), but share the conviction that Satan names a principle rather than a person. The affirmation is presented here as these groups describe their own beliefs. The Satanic Temple, founded in 2013 by Lucien Greaves and Malcolm Jarry, has pursued its stated goals largely through public activism and litigation rather than the more private ritual life the Church of Satan maintains, most visibly through its campaign to install a bronze statue of Baphomet at the Oklahoma State Capitol in response to a Ten Commandments monument there, and through lawsuits and public campaigns the organization frames as tests of religious liberty and church-state separation. Scholars of the group, including the researcher Joseph Laycock, have argued that The Satanic Temple functions in significant part as a form of political satire and civic activism carried out through explicitly religious means, a self-description the organization itself has generally embraced rather than disputed.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnAtheistic Satanism (Satan as symbol of the self), Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year