Home›Articles›Satan as a Symbol, Not a BeingArticlesSatan as a Symbol, Not a BeingCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Satan as a Symbol, Not a Being." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/atheistic-satanism-satan-as-symbol-of-the-self-satan-as-a-symbol-not-a-being.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Satan as a Symbol, Not a Being. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/atheistic-satanism-satan-as-symbol-of-the-self-satan-as-a-symbol-not-a-beingCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-satan-as-a-symbol-not-a-being, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Satan as a Symbol, Not a Being}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/atheistic-satanism-satan-as-symbol-of-the-self-satan-as-a-symbol-not-a-being}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreSatan as a Symbol, Not a Being The Church of Satan and The Satanic Temple affirm an atheistic Satanism in which Satan is a symbol rather than a literal deity. On this understanding there is no supernatural devil to worship; the figure of Satan is embraced as an emblem, of the questioning intellect, individual liberty, pride, carnal reality, and rebellion against arbitrary authority. These organisations describe themselves as non-theistic, rejecting belief in gods and the supernatural, and use Satanic imagery to represent human self-determination and opposition to what they see as repressive dogma. LaVey set out his philosophy in The Satanic Bible, published in 1969 and still the foundational text of the Church of Satan. Scholars of new religious movements, including James R. Lewis, have documented that LaVey drew substantially, without extensive attribution, on earlier sources, including Ayn Rand's philosophy of rational self-interest and the nineteenth-century writer Ragnar Redbeard's Might Is Right, combining them with borrowed ceremonial trappings into a self-consciously provocative synthesis LaVey presented as a wholly original philosophy, a scholarly finding that has not diminished the text's continuing influence within organized atheistic Satanism.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnAtheistic Satanism (Satan as symbol of the self), Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year