Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

A Family of Languages, Not a People

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
A Family of Languages, Not a People

Bantu is a linguistic classification and not an ethnic one, and the distinction has to be made first because it has repeatedly been ignored. The family holds something like five hundred languages spoken across most of Africa south of a line from Cameroon to Kenya, among them Swahili, Zulu, Shona, Kikongo, Luganda, Kinyarwanda and Xhosa, and the peoples speaking them are as different from one another as any set of peoples anywhere. The survey edited by Derek Nurse and Gerard Philippson is the standard reference.

The name comes from the widespread root for people, which appears with a class prefix as bantu, and it was coined by a nineteenth century philologist. In South Africa the apartheid state then took the word as an official ethnic label, which is why it carries an offensive charge there while remaining the ordinary neutral term in linguistics elsewhere. The atlas uses it only in the linguistic sense.

Religiously the family matters because a shared vocabulary travels with it. Terms for a high god, for the ancestors, for a spirit that possesses a person, for medicine and for the specialist who handles it recur across the family in cognate forms, which is evidence of a common inheritance of words rather than of a single religion.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.