Home›Articles›Recording, Migration and What Was DisplacedArticlesRecording, Migration and What Was DisplacedCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Recording, Migration and What Was Displaced." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/beta-israel-liturgical-chant-recording-migration-and-what-was-displaced.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Recording, Migration and What Was Displaced. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/beta-israel-liturgical-chant-recording-migration-and-what-was-displacedCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-recording-migration-and-what-was-displac, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Recording, Migration and What Was Displaced}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/beta-israel-liturgical-chant-recording-migration-and-what-was-displaced}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreRecording, Migration and What Was Displaced Kay Kaufman Shelemay went to the Gondar region in the mid 1970s and recorded the liturgy as the kessim then sang it. That fieldwork produced the first systematic transcription and analysis of the repertory, and it happened at almost the last possible moment: within a decade the community was leaving, and by 1991 the great majority of Beta Israel were in Israel. Shelemay's conclusion has shaped the argument ever since. She found deep and specific resemblances between the Beta Israel liturgy and Ethiopian Christian monastic practice, and read the community's religious system as having taken its present form inside Ethiopia, in contact with that monasticism, rather than as a survival of a pre-rabbinic Israelite liturgy. Steven Kaplan's history of the community reached compatible conclusions about its institutions. The community's own account, and a strand of earlier scholarship, holds instead for ancient descent. The atlas records the dating of the liturgy as contested, because both readings have supporters and both are argued from the same evidence. What has happened since is not contested. In Israel the rabbinate did not recognise the kessim as rabbis, and Beta Israel religious life has largely been absorbed into standard Israeli Jewish practice. The Ge'ez liturgy is now maintained by a small and ageing group of kessim, is not the ordinary Sabbath practice of most Ethiopian Israelis, and survives most fully in the recordings and transcriptions made before the migration. Whether it continues as a living office or only as a documented one is being decided now.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnBeta Israel Liturgical Chant, Sacred Sound Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year