Home›Articles›An Inscription Without a Documented FindspotArticlesAn Inscription Without a Documented FindspotCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "An Inscription Without a Documented Findspot." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/bibliotheque-nationale-de-france-an-inscription-without-a-documented-findspot.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). An Inscription Without a Documented Findspot. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/bibliotheque-nationale-de-france-an-inscription-without-a-documented-findspotCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-an-inscription-without-a-documented-find, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {An Inscription Without a Documented Findspot}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/bibliotheque-nationale-de-france-an-inscription-without-a-documented-findspot}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreAn Inscription Without a Documented Findspot The Nazareth Inscription's presence in the Bibliotheque nationale de France's collection is well documented from 1878, when Wilhelm Froehner's antiquities collection was acquired for the library, but its history before that point rests on a single handwritten note found with the slab rather than on any excavation record: the note stated only that the inscription had been sent from Nazareth in 1878, without naming who found it, where precisely, or under what circumstances. This gap is the central problem in everything written about the inscription since, because its striking content, an imperial edict prescribing severe penalties for disturbing graves, has been read by some as indirect evidence connected to reports of an empty tomb reaching Rome, a reading that depends entirely on the inscription originating in or near first century Judaea rather than from Froehner's wider Mediterranean and Levantine dealings. The library itself makes no claim about the inscription's original findspot beyond what Froehner's note states, and cataloguing the piece as a Nazareth acquisition records the note's claim rather than an independently verified excavation context. Specialists remain divided on whether the marble's style and lettering support a first century Judaean origin or a different date and region entirely, and the atlas follows the library's own caution rather than presenting the Nazareth attribution as established.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnBibliotheque nationale de France, Custodians & Museums Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year