The devotional claim is that this is the alms bowl of Gautama Buddha, the very bowl into which the Buddha received offerings, later enshrined in Gandhara and described by the Chinese pilgrims. The continuity of pilgrim testimony about a Gandharan relic bowl, and the object's undoubted antiquity and Buddhist ornament, are cited in support.
Scholars are sceptical of the specific identification. The decisive difficulty is scale: a bowl nearly two metres across cannot be a personal begging bowl carried by a mendicant, and the object is better understood as a large votive vessel, perhaps set in a monastery to receive the offerings of pilgrims, or a monumental commemorative copy of the relic bowl. Early texts even record competing claims to the location of the true bowl, so the tradition was not fixed on a single object. The Quranic inscriptions confirm a long and layered history of veneration but say nothing in favour of the attribution to the Buddha. No scientific or documentary finding has established the link, and reported Indian expert assessments have not confirmed it. The reasonable conclusion, reflected in the status here, is that the bowl is an authentic and important Gandharan Buddhist stone vessel whose identification as the Buddha's own alms bowl is traditional and, on the evidence, unlikely.