Home›Articles›The 1966 Time Cover, and What Vahanian Actually ArguedArticlesThe 1966 Time Cover, and What Vahanian Actually ArguedCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The 1966 Time Cover, and What Vahanian Actually Argued." Accessed September 2, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/death-of-god-theology-the-1966-time-cover-and-what-vahanian-actually-argued.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The 1966 Time Cover, and What Vahanian Actually Argued. Retrieved September 2, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/death-of-god-theology-the-1966-time-cover-and-what-vahanian-actually-arguedCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-1966-time-cover-and-what-vahanian-ac, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The 1966 Time Cover, and What Vahanian Actually Argued}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/death-of-god-theology-the-1966-time-cover-and-what-vahanian-actually-argued}, note = {Accessed September 2, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThe 1966 Time Cover, and What Vahanian Actually Argued Time magazine's cover for April 8, 1966 carried three words in red type on a plain black background, "Is God Dead?", the first time the magazine had run a cover with no image at all, and it remains the single most recognized artifact of this movement, far better known than any of the books that prompted it. The cover story reported on a genuine and often bitter dispute among a handful of American Protestant theologians, but its stark either or framing flattened a set of positions that disagreed sharply with each other into a single yes or no question about God's existence. Gabriel Vahanian, whose 1961 book The Death of God: The Culture of Our Post Christian Era had supplied the phrase five years earlier, is a useful corrective to the cover's framing precisely because his own argument was not the metaphysical claim the headline implies. Vahanian held that traditional Christian belief in a transcendent, sovereign God had lost its cultural plausibility in a secularized, technological modern West, so that "God is dead" functioned for him as a diagnosis of contemporary religious culture's indifference rather than an assertion that God, understood correctly, does not exist; he continued to argue for a recovered, less domesticated sense of divine transcendence rather than for atheism. That the phrase he coined became the banner over Altizer's far more radical claim that God had ceased to exist by pouring into the world is itself a measure of how far a single arresting sentence can travel from the argument that first stated it.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnDeath of God Theology, Schools of Theology Well-attested SourcesEncyclopedia of Religiontier 1Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year