Home›Articles›The Expanding Universe, Published in the Wrong JournalArticlesThe Expanding Universe, Published in the Wrong JournalCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Expanding Universe, Published in the Wrong Journal." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/georges-lemaitre-the-expanding-universe-published-in-the-wrong-journal.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Expanding Universe, Published in the Wrong Journal. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/georges-lemaitre-the-expanding-universe-published-in-the-wrong-journalCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-expanding-universe-published-in-the, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Expanding Universe, Published in the Wrong Journal}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/georges-lemaitre-the-expanding-universe-published-in-the-wrong-journal}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThe Expanding Universe, Published in the Wrong Journal In 1927 Lemaitre published a paper in the Annals of the Scientific Society of Brussels showing that the equations of general relativity permit a universe of constant mass and increasing radius, and deriving from it the relation between a galaxy's distance and the speed at which it recedes. He estimated the constant of proportionality from data then available. Two years later Edwin Hubble published the observational relation, and it carries Hubble's name. The Brussels journal was not read. Einstein, when Lemaitre described the work to him at the 1927 Solvay conference, is reported to have said that the calculations were correct but the physics abominable. Arthur Eddington, who had supervised Lemaitre at Cambridge, arranged for an English translation in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1931. That translation is missing the paragraph containing the velocity distance relation and the estimate of the constant, and for eighty years the omission was widely assumed to be an act of suppression by someone protecting Hubble's priority. In 2011 Lemaitre's own correspondence with the journal settled it: he removed the passage himself, telling the editor there was no point reprinting a provisional estimate when much better observational data had since become available. He does not appear to have cared who got the credit, which is unusual enough to be worth recording.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnGeorges Lemaître, Historical Figures Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year