Wande Abimbola, a leading Nigerian scholar of Ifa and a babalawo who later served in Nigerian public life, has been among the most prominent voices publicly supporting the initiation of women as iyanifa, arguing that restricting the office to men reflects a departure from older practice rather than its preservation, a position that carries particular weight because it comes from within the tradition's own senior scholarly ranks rather than from external critics.
The practice has taken hold unevenly by region rather than settling the underlying dispute: iyanifa initiation is now relatively well established among Ifa communities in Cuba, Brazil and the United States, where diaspora lineages have in many cases moved further and faster on the question than some traditionalist lineages in Nigeria itself, producing the somewhat unusual pattern of a practice being more secure far from its geographic origin than close to it, a pattern that mirrors similar diaspora-versus-homeland differences documented in other transplanted African religious traditions.
The theological argument on the restrictive side generally rests on accounts holding that Orunmila, the deity identified with Ifa wisdom, personally initiated only men among his original followers, and that the corpus of Odu itself nowhere records a female babalawo from the founding generation; those who initiate women reply that the same corpus preserves several verses describing women skilled in divination and argue that later redactors, not the original tradition, narrowed the office to men. Neither side's textual argument has persuaded the other, and lineages continue to divide along the same line they always have.