Home›Articles›The Letter to Leibniz, and a Coincidence Both Men Over-ReadArticlesThe Letter to Leibniz, and a Coincidence Both Men Over-ReadCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Letter to Leibniz, and a Coincidence Both Men Over-Read." Accessed September 2, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/joachim-bouvet-the-letter-to-leibniz-and-a-coincidence-both-men-over-read.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Letter to Leibniz, and a Coincidence Both Men Over-Read. Retrieved September 2, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/joachim-bouvet-the-letter-to-leibniz-and-a-coincidence-both-men-over-readCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-letter-to-leibniz-and-a-coincidence, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Letter to Leibniz, and a Coincidence Both Men Over-Read}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/joachim-bouvet-the-letter-to-leibniz-and-a-coincidence-both-men-over-read}, note = {Accessed September 2, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThe Letter to Leibniz, and a Coincidence Both Men Over-Read The one lasting result of the Figurist programme came out of correspondence. Bouvet sent Leibniz a diagram of the sixty four hexagrams in the arrangement attributed to Fuxi. Leibniz had been working on binary arithmetic for years and recognised his own notation at once: read a broken line as nought and a solid line as one, and the Fuxi order counts from zero to sixty three in binary. Each man took the coincidence as confirmation of what he already held. For Bouvet it proved that the classics preserved a lost science. For Leibniz it suggested that the ancient Chinese had known a truth their descendants had forgotten, and it fitted his own theological reading of binary, in which everything is generated from one and nothing. Almost every later Western treatment of the Book of Changes as a binary, mathematical or informational system descends from that exchange, and it is worth being clear about what the exchange did and did not establish. The correspondence between the Fuxi order and binary counting is exact and is not in dispute. What neither man could show is that anyone in China had ever read the arrangement that way, and the ordering itself is a product of the Song dynasty rather than of high antiquity.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnJoachim Bouvet, Historical Figures Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year