Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Forty Three Letters of the Slavonic Alphabet, Borrowed Mostly From Greek and Numbered by Its Rules

Articles

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Forty Three Letters of the Slavonic Alphabet, Borrowed Mostly From Greek and Numbered by Its Rules

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Cyrillic Letters gathers the forty three signs of the alphabet made for Slavonic worship, showing how a script built mostly from Greek letterforms carries a numbering system, a set of native additions, and a small tail of signs kept only for spelling Greek words.

The first ten letters recite as a sentence, azu buky vedi glagol dobro jest, I know letters, speaking is a good thing, and the pattern continues through kako lyudiye myslete, how people think, before the names run out of sense at tverdo. Cyrillic takes its numerals from Greek letter for letter, so vedi carries the two that Greek beta holds once its sound had shifted to v, leaving buky, the letter it actually replaced, with no numeral at all; that borrowing is why the Cyrillic count and the Glagolitic count of the same letters disagree at almost every point.

Where Slavonic had a sound Greek lacked, the alphabet borrowed a shape from Glagolitic instead, zhivete, tsy, cherv, sha and shta among them, and none of those five carries a Greek numeral. The two jers, yer and yeri, wrote reduced vowels that later Slavic either lost or turned into the modern hard and soft signs, and the yus letters recorded nasal vowels that survived in Bulgarian orthography into the twentieth century. Ksi, psi, fita and izhitsa exist only to spell Greek names and were dropped from Russian civil printing under Peter the Great, though they remained in church books.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Sources
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.