Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Not Satanism, and Not the Conspiracy

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Not Satanism, and Not the Conspiracy

Two confusions dominate the public picture of Luciferianism, and they run in opposite directions.

The first is the collapse of Luciferianism into Satanism. There is real overlap: both are adversarial, both invert a Christian valuation, and individuals move between them. But the emphasis differs. Luciferianism foregrounds illumination, knowledge and refinement of the self, with Lucifer as teacher and liberator; Satanism in its dominant modern form foregrounds carnality, self-interest and the rejection of herd morality, with Satan as a symbol of the natural human animal. The Church of Satan rejects the distinction outright and treats Lucifer as simply one of Satan's names, which is itself evidence that the boundary is contested rather than agreed. A further difference is that Luciferianism contains a genuine theistic wing, while the largest Satanist organisations are formally atheistic.

The second confusion is far more consequential. Outside occultism, the word Luciferian is used mainly as a conspiracy term, denoting an alleged secret elite (variously Masonic, financial, political or entertainment-industry), said to worship Lucifer and to control world events. This usage descends directly from Leo Taxil, who invented a Luciferian Masonic order called Palladism in the 1880s and 1890s, complete with rituals and a fictitious high priestess, and who confessed the whole thing as a hoax in Paris in April 1897. The confession did not stop the material. It was recycled through twentieth-century anti-Masonic and antisemitic literature, through the Satanic Panic, and into contemporary online conspiracy movements.

The two senses of the word have almost nothing in common. Actual Luciferians are a small, decentralised, largely literary occult current with no political power and no institutional wealth. Being named in conspiracy literature is not evidence about the people so named, and the durability of that literature, more than a century after its author confessed to inventing it, is a fact about the audience rather than about Luciferianism.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.