Egyptologist Jan Assmann gave the ethical structure behind maat a name that has become the standard scholarly term for it, connective justice, konnektive Gerechtigkeit in his own German. The idea is that maat is not a static order handed down once and simply obeyed, it is a web of obligation that connects people to each other and to the past and future across time, so that upholding it means keeping faith with commitments already made and with people not present to enforce them, rather than following a fixed law code. Assmann built the reading from a wide span of ancient Egyptian material, from temple inscriptions to funerary texts to wisdom literature, and argued that this connective structure is precisely what let the concept travel so far outside its original royal and priestly setting, since a king upholding cosmic order and an ordinary person keeping a promise are doing structurally the same thing at different scale. Modern Kemetic practitioners inherit that structure more than they inherit any specific ancient legal content, which is why practitioners describe maat in terms of honest dealing and obligations kept rather than in terms of ritual correctness alone. Assmann's own interest was ancient Egyptian religion as such, and the modern application is a later transposition his scholarship did not itself argue for.