Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Fifty Years of Argument About Something Nobody Can Examine

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Fifty Years of Argument About Something Nobody Can Examine

The dispute began almost at once and has not ended. On one side, Morton Smith himself, and later Scott G. Brown and Charles Hedrick, argued that the letter is a genuine copy of a lost work of Clement and that its Greek, its argument and its use of Clement's vocabulary are beyond the reach of a forger. On the other, Stephen C. Carlson, Peter Jeffery and Francis Watson have argued that it is a modern composition, and Carlson argued specifically that Smith wrote it himself, pointing to features of the handwriting he read as signs of a slow, drawn hand imitating a script rather than writing one.

That is a genuine disagreement between serious people, and the atlas records it as one. What makes it unusual is that it cannot be settled by the means that settle such questions elsewhere.

The volume moved to the library of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in Jerusalem in 1976. In 1983 a team examined it and took colour photographs, and at that point the leaves were removed from the book, reportedly for separate conservation. They have not been publicly produced since. No ink analysis has ever been done. No paper analysis. No forensic examination of the hand with the original in front of the examiner. Fifty years of argument, on both sides, rests entirely on photographs, and where the leaves are now is simply not known.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.