Home›Articles›A Second, Later Source Written After the FiresArticlesA Second, Later Source Written After the FiresCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Second, Later Source Written After the Fires." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/maya-religion-historical-prayer-corpus-a-second-later-source-written-after-the-fires.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Second, Later Source Written After the Fires. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/maya-religion-historical-prayer-corpus-a-second-later-source-written-after-the-firesCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-second-later-source-written-after-the, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Second, Later Source Written After the Fires}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/maya-religion-historical-prayer-corpus-a-second-later-source-written-after-the-fires}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Second, Later Source Written After the Fires Alongside the surviving pre-conquest hieroglyphic codices, the Popol Vuh, the major Kiche Maya narrative of creation catalogued elsewhere in this atlas, represents a different and later kind of source, transcribed into the Latin alphabet in the sixteenth century, likely by literate Kiche nobles recording older oral and possibly hieroglyphic tradition in a new written form specifically in order to preserve it under conditions of colonial suppression of indigenous religious material, giving it a transmission history closer in kind, though not identical in every particular, to the colonial-era recording that produced the Aztec Florentine Codex material discussed elsewhere in this atlas. Ongoing decipherment of Maya hieroglyphic script, a project still actively developing among specialists and not yet fully complete even after decades of significant scholarly progress, continues to affect how confidently scholars can read and interpret the surviving pre-conquest material, meaning translations and interpretations of texts such as the Madrid Codex's rain-related content remain subject to ongoing revision as decipherment work progresses. This entry records the corpus as a whole and the genuinely different evidentiary status of its pre-conquest hieroglyphic and later colonial-era alphabetic sources.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnMaya Religion Historical Prayer Corpus, Prayers Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year