Home›Articles›Egypt Remembered, and a Pharaoh Left UnnamedArticlesEgypt Remembered, and a Pharaoh Left UnnamedCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Egypt Remembered, and a Pharaoh Left Unnamed." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/miketz-egypt-remembered-and-a-pharaoh-left-unnamed.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Egypt Remembered, and a Pharaoh Left Unnamed. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/miketz-egypt-remembered-and-a-pharaoh-left-unnamedCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-egypt-remembered-and-a-pharaoh-left-unna, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Egypt Remembered, and a Pharaoh Left Unnamed}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/miketz-egypt-remembered-and-a-pharaoh-left-unnamed}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreEgypt Remembered, and a Pharaoh Left Unnamed Joseph's rise at Pharaoh's court is narrated with details, a signet ring, garments of fine linen, a gold chain, a chariot and heralds, and an Egyptian name and wife given him at his elevation, Zaphenath-paneah and Asenath daughter of the priest of On (Genesis 41:42-45), that historians of ancient Egypt read as reflecting genuine familiarity with pharaonic court customs and titulary conventions on the part of the narrative's authors or tradents. What the text withholds is any name for the pharaoh himself, and biblical historians remain divided over when to set the story, proposals ranging across the Middle Kingdom, the Hyksos period and the New Kingdom, none commanding a scholarly consensus, since Egyptian records offer no independent confirmation of Joseph or his family's presence. Traditional commentary is generally uninterested in fixing a historical period for the narrative, reading it instead as a continuous account of divine providence working through Joseph's administrative competence; some classical and medieval Jewish exegetes nonetheless discussed the identity of 'a king who did not know Joseph' in the following book as implying a change of dynasty, an early instance of the tradition itself registering the same question modern historians ask in different terms.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnMiketz, Scripture Portions Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year