Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

The Ship in the Mound, and How Rare It Was

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
The Ship in the Mound, and How Rare It Was

The image of a Viking sent out to sea in a burning ship is not what the evidence shows. It is a nineteenth century picture, and the excavated graves say something more interesting.

The great Norwegian ship burials were static. At Oseberg, buried in 834, a seagoing vessel was dragged up from the water, set in a trench, filled with a burial chamber, and covered by a mound of turf and clay that sealed it well enough to preserve the wood, the textiles and a carved cart. Gokstad was much the same. These ships went nowhere; they were furnished, occupied and buried in the ground, and the mound over them was a landmark visible from a distance.

Other forms existed alongside. Ships were burnt with their dead in some places. In others, particularly on Gotland and in parts of southern Scandinavia, the dead were laid in a setting of standing stones arranged in the outline of a hull, a ship shape with no ship, which shows that the meaning could be carried by the form alone.

What all of them have in common is expense. A ship was among the most costly objects a Norse community could make, and putting one in the ground took it permanently out of use. Ship burials are a fraction of a percent of excavated Viking Age graves. Most people were cremated and the ashes placed in a small mound or a flat grave, with modest goods or none, and any account of Norse funerary religion that starts from Oseberg has started at the far end of the scale.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.