Learn More
The Pouch That Carried the Urim and Thummim
What made the hoshen more than an ornamented panel was its function as a container: the doubled fold of linen formed a pocket in which the Urim and Thummim were kept, so the garment and the oracular objects were, in practical terms, a single working system rather than two unrelated sacred items that happened to be stored together. Rabbinic tradition developed extensive commentary on how the breastplate was consulted, describing an inquiry in which letters from the engraved tribal names on the stones were understood to illuminate in sequence to spell an answer, though the biblical text itself is far more reticent about the mechanism than the later commentary is, and how the process actually worked in practice during the First Temple period remains genuinely uncertain rather than settled by any single authoritative account.
Like the ephod it was attached to, the hoshen went out of use with the end of the Second Temple's sacrificial service, and its stones, exact form and method of oracular use are known only through the biblical description and the substantial body of later rabbinic interpretation built upon it. No breastplate or ephod survives archaeologically from the First or Second Temple period, so every physical claim about their appearance rests on the biblical text and on later interpretation built upon it, not on any object that can be examined directly.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.